MGV vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees
MGV and OAKM hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and MGV returned +21.5% over the year. Net assets: $13.5bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Mega Cap Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.
MGV costs 0.54 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.7 points.
| MGV | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.05% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, MGV as of Sep 30, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 | $13.5bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.5% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | CRSP U.S. Mega Cap Value Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 28.5% | 37.0% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MGV and OAKM hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
12% in common
On the same fields
MGV and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
MGV in plain words
MGV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.5% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 123 positions, with the top ten at 28.5%.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MGV or OAKM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MGV returned +21.5% and OAKM +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, MGV or OAKM?
- MGV is cheaper, by 0.54 percentage points a year. That is about $54 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MGV against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgv-vs-oakm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MGV against OAKM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgv-vs-oakm
[MGV against OAKM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mgv-vs-oakm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.