Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
IUS vs SCHV: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, IUS returned +25.9% to SCHV's +20.8%; 47% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about IUS and SCHVNet assets: $1.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Invesco RAFI Strategic US ETF, and $15.7bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHV costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.1 points.
| Measure | IUS | SCHV |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +25.9% | +20.8% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Invesco Strategic US Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.19% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, IUS as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHV as of Aug 31, 2026 | $1.0bn | $15.7bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 47% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 27.2% | 20.3% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, IUS and SCHV hold 47% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
47% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
IUS and SCHV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IUS and SCHV are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IUS follows Invesco Strategic US Index and SCHV follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Value Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 47% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 IUS returned +25.9% and SCHV +20.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 5.1 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +25.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index.
IUS tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.19% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 536 positions, with the top ten at 27.2%.
SCHV
SCHV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +20.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 555 positions, with the top ten at 20.3%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IUS or SCHV?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUS returned +25.9% and SCHV +20.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IUS or SCHV?
- SCHV is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IUS against SCHV, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ius-vs-schv
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). IUS against SCHV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ius-vs-schv
[IUS against SCHV (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ius-vs-schv)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.