FNDX vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDX and OAKM hold 12% of their weight in the same names, and FNDX returned +24.4% over the year. Net assets: $25.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.
FNDX costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points.
| FNDX | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of May 31, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 | $25.5bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 12% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.4% | 37.0% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and OAKM hold 12% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
12% in common
On the same fields
FNDX and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX in plain words
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.4%.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or OAKM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +24.4% and OAKM +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or OAKM?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-oakm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDX against OAKM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-oakm
[FNDX against OAKM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-oakm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.