FNDX vs NULV: Differences, Returns & Fees
FNDX and NULV hold 22% of their weight in the same names, and NULV returned +25.6% over the year. Net assets: $25.5bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $2.2bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Nuveen ESG Large-Cap Value ETF.
FNDX costs 0.01 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points.
| FNDX | NULV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.26% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of May 31, 2026 and NULV as of Jul 31, 2026 | $25.5bn | $2.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +24.4% | +25.6% |
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Nuveen ESG USA Large-Cap Value Index |
| Holdings in common | 22% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.4% | 28.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and NULV hold 22% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
22% in common
On the same fields
FNDX and NULV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FNDX
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.4% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 733 positions, with the top ten at 22.4%.
About NULV
NULV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.6% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.26% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 101 positions, with the top ten at 28.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or NULV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +24.4% and NULV +25.6%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or NULV?
- FNDX is cheaper, by 0.01 percentage points a year. That is about $1 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against NULV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nulv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FNDX against NULV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nulv
[FNDX against NULV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-nulv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.