Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to SCHX's +13.1%; 63% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and SCHX
Net assets on Aug 31, 2026: $27.6bn for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF and $74.2bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.
Pair scorecard
SCHX costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.8 points; SCHX is 2.7 times larger.
| Measure | FNDX | SCHX |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +13.1% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Aug 31, 2026 | $27.6bn | $74.2bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 63% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 36.0% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method
Risk and return
Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026 · 687 weekly returnsEach against its own benchmark: FNDX against IWB, Aug 23, 2013 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.
SCHX returned slightly more: +462.5% to +418.7%. FNDX and SCHX swung about the same: 15.9% and 16.2%. SCHX fell slightly less at its worst: −32.3% to −35.2%.
Full scorecard
19 measures, with how each is measured Open ↓
| Measure | FNDX | SCHX | Edge | How it is measured |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Return | ||||
| Total return | +418.7% | +462.5% | SCHX (slight) | Price change plus distributions, reinvested. |
| Annualized | +13.3% | +14.0% | SCHX (slight) | Total return as a yearly rate. |
| Price return | +298.9% | +350.9% | SCHX | Price change alone, distributions left out. |
| Risk | ||||
| Volatility | 15.9% | 16.2% | Tie | Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier. |
| Downside deviation | 11.2% | 11.3% | Tie | Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate. |
| Max drawdown | −35.2% | −32.3% | SCHX (slight) | Deepest fall from a high to the low after it. |
| Upside capture | 86.4% | 100.5% | Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose. | |
| Downside capture | 92.1% | 100.5% | Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better. | |
| Beta | 0.93 | 1.01 | Not an edge | How far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves. |
| R squared | 0.90 | 1.00 | Not an edge | Share of its weekly moves its benchmark explains. |
| Risk-adjusted | ||||
| Sharpe | 0.74 | 0.77 | SCHX (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of volatility. |
| Sortino | 1.05 | 1.11 | SCHX (slight) | Return above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation. |
| Treynor | 0.128 | 0.129 | Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta. | |
| Calmar | 0.38 | 0.43 | SCHX | Annualized return divided by the max drawdown. |
| Against the benchmark | ||||
| Benchmark | IWB | IVV | The ETF each fund is measured against. | |
| Alpha | +0.4% a year | −0.1% a year | Not significant | Yearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts. |
| Alpha t-stat | 0.28 | −0.62 | Not an edge | How sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance. |
| Alpha range | −2.4% to +3.2% | −0.6% to +0.3% | Includes zero | The 95% range for the yearly alpha. |
| Information ratio | −0.10 | −0.05 | Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error. | |
| Tracking error | 5.3% | 0.9% | Not an edge | How far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized. |
Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 687 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and SCHX hold 63% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.
half
63% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 10.8 points.
- Cost. FNDX charges 0.25% of assets a year and SCHX 0.03%, a gap of 0.22 points.
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index.
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
SCHX
SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or SCHX?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and SCHX +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or SCHX?
- SCHX is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-schx
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against SCHX. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-schx
[FNDX against SCHX (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-schx)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.