Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

CGDV vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, CGDV returned +15.8% to SCHX's +13.1%; 38% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about CGDV and SCHX

Net assets: $39.1bn on Oct 27, 2026 for Capital Group Dividend Value ETF, and $74.2bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF.

At a glance
+15.8%
CGDV total return, 1 year
+13.1%
SCHX total return, 1 year
0.33%
CGDV expense ratio
0.03%
SCHX expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHX costs 0.30 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.7 points.

CGDV vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVSCHX
Return
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+13.1%
Drawdown
Below its high3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.33%0.03%
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026$39.1bn$74.2bn
Holdings
Holdings in common38%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund42.0%36.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026 · 242 weekly returns
CGDV SCHX
Return
Total return edge CGDV +107.2% +85.7%
Annualized edge CGDV +16.9% +14.2%
Price return edge CGDV +93.0% +74.2%
Risk
Volatility edge CGDV 14.8% 16.6%
Max drawdown edge Tie −21.1% −21.0%
Downside capture 88.1% 100.5%
Beta 0.93 1.01
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge CGDV 0.85 0.63
Sortino edge CGDV 1.28 0.95
Treynor 0.134 0.129
Calmar edge CGDV 0.80 0.68
Against the benchmark
Alpha +4.4% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.70 −0.62
Information ratio 0.68 −0.05
Tracking error 5.6% 0.9%

Each against its own benchmark: CGDV against IWD, Mar 4, 2022 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHX against IVV, Nov 13, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

CGDV returned more: +107.2% to +85.7%. CGDV swung less: 14.8% to 16.6%. CGDV and SCHX fell about the same at their worst: −21.1% and −21.0%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: CGDV vs SCHX: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureCGDVSCHXEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+107.2%+85.7%CGDVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+16.9%+14.2%CGDVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+93.0%+74.2%CGDVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility14.8%16.6%CGDVSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation9.8%11.0%CGDVLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−21.1%−21.0%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture93.8%100.5%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture88.1%100.5%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.931.01Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.861.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.850.63CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.280.95CGDVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1340.129Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.68CGDVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+4.4% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.70−0.62Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−0.7% to +9.4%−0.6% to +0.3%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.68−0.05Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error5.6%0.9%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 242 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

38%

By the books each fund has filed, CGDV and SCHX hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

38% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first CGDV SCHX
NVIDIA Corp 6.32% 7.69%
Microsoft Corp 7.64% 5.42%
Alphabet Inc 3.55% 2.86%
Broadcom Inc 4.67% 2.52%
Apple Inc 2.21% 6.69%
Amazon.com Inc 2.00% 3.66%
Meta Platforms Inc 4.27% 1.81%
JPMorgan Chase & Co 2.19% 1.37%
Eli Lilly & Co 1.91% 1.32%
ExxonMobil Holdings Corp 1.31% 0.96%
Micron Technology Inc 0.80% 1.56%
Mastercard Inc 1.51% 0.68%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in CGDV
British American Tobacco PLC 2.26%
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co Ltd 2.08%
TC Energy Corp 1.01%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.85%
Capital Group Central Cash Fund 0.72%
Only in SCHX
Alphabet Inc 2.28%
Tesla Inc 1.49%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.33%
Advanced Micro Devices Inc 1.10%
Johnson & Johnson 0.92%
Visa Inc 0.91%
Walmart Inc 0.66%
Palantir Technologies Inc 0.62%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

CGDV Capital Group Dividend Value ETF SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +13.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark −11.7 pts vs IWD −0.6 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.33% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 91.7% 93.6%
Holdings 53 747
Net assets, CGDV as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHX as of Aug 31, 2026 $39.1bn $74.2bn

CGDV and SCHX on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-7F5DF3211C

CGDV and SCHX do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. CGDV follows No index, actively managed and SCHX follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 CGDV returned +15.8% and SCHX +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.7 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
CGDV

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

CGDV is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.33% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 53 positions, with the top ten at 42.0%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHX

SCHX tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 747 positions, with the top ten at 36.0%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, CGDV or SCHX?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, CGDV returned +15.8% and SCHX +13.1%.
Which is cheaper, CGDV or SCHX?
SCHX is cheaper, by 0.30 percentage points a year. That is about $30 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do CGDV and SCHX overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of CGDV and 94% of SCHX by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, CGDV against SCHX, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/cgdv-vs-schx

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.