IUSV vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees

IUSV and OAKM hold 11% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $27.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.

IUSV costs 0.55 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.5 points; IUSV is far larger, $26.5bn against $1.0bn.

IUSVOAKM
Expense ratio0.04%0.59%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$26.5bn$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year+14.3%+14.8%
What it tracksS&P 900 Value IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common11%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund23.4%37.0%
Below its high6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+14.3%
IUSV total return, 1 year
+14.8%
OAKM total return, 1 year
0.04%
IUSV expense ratio
0.59%
OAKM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IUSV and OAKM hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

11% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IUSV OAKM
AMAZON.COM INC 3.75% 1.62%
MERCK & CO INC 1.13% 3.35%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.12% 3.42%
WELLS FARGO 0.79% 2.13%
CITIGROUP 0.69% 4.09%
SALESFORCE 0.60% 3.03%
UNION PACIFIC 0.53% 2.90%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.52% 2.66%
CHARLES SCHWAB 0.50% 2.93%
ACCENTURE PLC CLASS A 0.41% 1.36%
CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL CORP 0.39% 3.56%
PHILLIPS 66 0.36% 1.53%
Only in IUSV
APPLE 7.96%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 2.22%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.70%
WALMART 1.58%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 1.35%
CHEVRON 1.34%
TESLA INC 1.29%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 1.12%
Only in OAKM
First Citizens BancShares Inc/NC 2.36%
AerCap Holdings NV 2.24%
Amrize Ltd 1.78%
Alphabet Inc 1.44%
Netflix Inc 1.42%
Alphabet Inc 0.74%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IUSV
iShares Core S&P U.S. Value ETF
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +14.3% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.9 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.04% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 94.1% 91.9%
Holdings 734 39
Net assets, IUSV as of Oct 9, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 $27.6bn $1.0bn

IUSV and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IUSV in plain words

IUSV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 734 positions, with the top ten at 23.4%.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IUSV or OAKM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IUSV returned +14.3% and OAKM +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, IUSV or OAKM?
IUSV is cheaper, by 0.55 percentage points a year. That is about $55 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IUSV and OAKM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of IUSV and 92% of OAKM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IUSV against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iusv-vs-oakm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.