A
vs
B
Share
Ask IQ about these two funds

DGRO vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees

DGRO and OAKM hold 10% of their weight in the same names, and DGRO returned +15.8% over the year. Net assets: $43.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.

DGRO costs 0.51 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.0 point; DGRO is far larger, $41.2bn against $1.0bn.

DGROOAKM
Expense ratio0.08%0.59%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026$41.2bn$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year+15.8%+14.8%
What it tracksMorningstar US Dividend Growth IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common10%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund27.4%37.0%
Below its high6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+15.8%
DGRO total return, 1 year
+14.8%
OAKM total return, 1 year
0.08%
DGRO expense ratio
0.59%
OAKM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DGRO and OAKM hold 10% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

10% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DGRO OAKM
MERCK & CO INC 1.81% 3.35%
BANK OF AMERICA 1.42% 3.42%
WELLS FARGO 1.26% 2.13%
ACCENTURE PLC CLASS A 1.02% 1.36%
CITIGROUP 0.95% 4.09%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.92% 2.66%
UNION PACIFIC 0.74% 2.90%
PHILLIPS 66 0.51% 1.53%
ELEVANCE HEALTH INC 0.32% 3.38%
KEURIG DR PEPPER INC 0.27% 4.00%
INTERCONTINENTAL EXCHANGE INC 0.26% 2.82%
STATE STREET 0.19% 3.87%
Only in DGRO
MICROSOFT 3.21%
APPLE 3.17%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 3.16%
ABBVIE 2.97%
BROADCOM INC 2.79%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.75%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.75%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 2.38%
Only in OAKM
Delta Air Lines Inc 3.89%
Targa Resources Corp 3.77%
Capital One Financial Corp 3.56%
Airbnb Inc 3.47%
Salesforce Inc 3.03%
Fiserv Inc 2.95%
Charles Schwab Corp/The 2.93%
American International Group Inc 2.85%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares Oakmark
What it is Tracks an index of Dividend Growth Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +15.8% +14.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −1.5 pts −2.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.08% 0.59%
Already in the S&P 500 91.8% 91.9%
Holdings 393 39
Net assets, DGRO as of Oct 9, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 $43.1bn $1.0bn

DGRO and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

DGRO in plain words

DGRO tracks an index of Dividend Growth. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +15.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 393 positions, with the top ten at 27.4%.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DGRO or OAKM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DGRO returned +15.8% and OAKM +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, DGRO or OAKM?
DGRO is cheaper, by 0.51 percentage points a year. That is about $51 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DGRO and OAKM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of DGRO and 92% of OAKM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
DGRO vs DLNDGRO vs VOOVDGRO vs JAVADGRO vs VLUEIVE vs OAKMOAKM vs SPYVOAKM vs VYMIWD vs OAKM
DGRO on its own →OAKM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
DGRO filings on SEC EDGAR ↗DGRO prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for DGRO ↗OAKM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗OAKM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DGRO against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dgro-vs-oakm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.