IWD vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWD and OAKM hold 9% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets: $82.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.
IWD costs 0.41 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.6 points; IWD is far larger, $79.7bn against $1.0bn.
| IWD | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.18% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $79.7bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +26.4% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | Russell 1000 Value Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 9% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.0% | 37.0% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWD and OAKM hold 9% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
9% in common
On the same fields
IWD and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
IWD in plain words
IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWD or OAKM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +26.4% and OAKM +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, IWD or OAKM?
- IWD is cheaper, by 0.41 percentage points a year. That is about $41 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWD against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-oakm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWD against OAKM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-oakm
[IWD against OAKM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-oakm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.