IWD vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWD and JAVA hold 49% of their weight in the same names, and IWD returned +26.4% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $82.9bn for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF and $7.2bn for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

IWD costs 0.26 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.1 points; IWD is 11.6 times larger.

IWD vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWDJAVA
Expense ratio0.18%0.44%
Net assets$82.9bn$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year+26.4%+20.3%
What it tracksRussell 1000 Value IndexNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund30.0%30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+26.4%
IWD total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.18%
IWD expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWD and JAVA hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

49% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWD JAVA
AMAZON.COM INC 6.28% 7.76%
MICROSOFT 5.35% 6.31%
APPLE 6.01% 3.93%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.59% 1.32%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.70% 1.28%
ABBVIE 1.21% 1.82%
CHEVRON 1.06% 1.22%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 0.92% 1.18%
BANK OF AMERICA 0.88% 2.19%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL 0.85% 1.12%
MERCK & CO INC 0.97% 0.78%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 0.77% 1.55%
Only in IWD
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.40%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.26%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.64%
LINDE PLC 0.60%
GILEAD SCIENCES 0.51%
QUALCOMM 0.50%
SALESFORCE 0.49%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC 0.47%
Only in JAVA
NXP SEMICONDUCTORS NV 0.89%
NVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK 0.84%
SERVICENOW INC COMMON 0.60%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 0.57%
BOOKING HOLDINGS INC 0.51%
CENCORA INC COMMON STOCK 0.44%
KONTOOR BRANDS INC 0.44%
TEXAS INSTRUMENTS INC 0.40%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWD
iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the Russell 1000 value Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +26.4% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days +26.5% (VONV) +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VONV −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.18% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 90.0% 90.4%
Holdings 871 151
Net assets $82.9bn $7.2bn

IWD and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.4% with distributions reinvested, against +26.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 30.0%.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWD or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWD returned +26.4% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, IWD or JAVA?
IWD is cheaper, by 0.26 percentage points a year. That is about $26 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWD and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 90% of IWD and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWD against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwd-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.