Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

AVLV vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, AVLV returned +29.6% to IWD's +27.5%; 33% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about AVLV and IWD

Net assets on Oct 27, 2026: $22.4bn for Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF and $83.0bn for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.

At a glance
+29.6%
AVLV total return, 1 year
+27.5%
IWD total return, 1 year
0.15%
AVLV expense ratio
0.18%
IWD expense ratio

Pair scorecard

AVLV costs 0.03 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 2.1 points; IWD is 3.7 times larger.

AVLV vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAVLVIWD
Return
Total return, 1 year+29.6%+27.5%
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedRussell 1000 Value Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.18%
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026$22.4bn$83.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common33%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund26.8%29.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026 · 264 weekly returns
AVLV IWD
Return
Total return edge AVLV +100.3% +78.5%
Annualized edge AVLV +14.7% +12.1%
Price return edge AVLV +84.5% +62.4%
Risk
Volatility edge IWD 16.0% 14.4%
Max drawdown edge Tie −18.3% −18.6%
Downside capture 100.6% 100.2%
Beta 1.06 1.00
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge AVLV 0.69 0.60
Sortino edge AVLV 0.99 0.86
Treynor 0.104 0.110
Calmar edge AVLV 0.80 0.65
Against the benchmark
Alpha +2.0% a year −0.1% a year
Alpha t-stat 0.94 −0.23
Information ratio 0.52 −0.08
Tracking error 4.8% 1.1%

Each against its own benchmark: AVLV against IWD, Oct 1, 2021 to Oct 23, 2026; IWD against VONV, Oct 1, 2010 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

AVLV returned more: +100.3% to +78.5%. IWD swung less: 14.4% to 16.0%. AVLV and IWD fell about the same at their worst: −18.3% and −18.6%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: AVLV vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureAVLVIWDEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+100.3%+78.5%AVLVPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+14.7%+12.1%AVLVTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+84.5%+62.4%AVLVPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility16.0%14.4%IWDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation11.2%10.0%IWDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−18.3%−18.6%TieDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture108.3%100.0%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture100.6%100.2%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.061.00Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.911.00Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.690.60AVLVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.990.86AVLVReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1040.110Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.800.65AVLVAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkIWDVONVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+2.0% a year−0.1% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat0.94−0.23Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.2% to +6.1%−0.6% to +0.5%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.52−0.08Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error4.8%1.1%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 264 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

33%

By the books each fund has filed, AVLV and IWD hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

33% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first AVLV IWD
MICROSOFT CORP COMMON STOCK USD.00000625 3.48% 5.21%
AMAZON.COM INC COMMON STOCK USD.01 2.92% 5.95%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK USD.00001 2.85% 6.08%
JPMORGAN CHASE + CO COMMON STOCK USD1.0 2.66% 2.37%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP COMMON STOCK 2.56% 1.96%
CHEVRON CORP COMMON STOCK USD.75 1.02% 1.12%
WELLS FARGO + CO COMMON STOCK USD1.666 1.39% 0.66%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP COMMON STOCK USD.005 2.29% 0.66%
META PLATFORMS INC CLASS A COMMON STOCK USD.000006 2.91% 0.66%
MORGAN STANLEY COMMON STOCK USD.01 1.41% 0.55%
QUALCOMM INC COMMON STOCK USD.0001 0.84% 0.51%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC COMMON STOCK USD.1 1.54% 0.49%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in AVLV
MICRON TECHNOLOGY INC COMMON STOCK USD.1 2.96%
ELI LILLY + CO COMMON STOCK 2.51%
CATERPILLAR INC COMMON STOCK USD1.0 1.06%
NETFLIX INC COMMON STOCK USD.001 0.97%
TARGA RESOURCES CORP COMMON STOCK USD.001 0.79%
DEXCOM INC COMMON STOCK USD.001 0.48%
CHIPOTLE MEXICAN GRILL INC COMMON STOCK USD.01 0.45%
ATI INC COMMON STOCK USD.1 0.37%
Only in IWD
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 2.67%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.71%
ABBVIE 1.23%
CISCO SYSTEMS INC 1.16%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.13%
PROCTER & GAMBLE 0.98%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP 0.98%
MERCK & CO INC 0.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

AVLV Avantis U.S. Large Cap Value ETF IWD iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Russell 1000 value
Total return, 1 year +29.6% +27.5%
Its benchmark over the same days +27.5% (IWD) +27.7% (VONV)
Gap to its benchmark +2.1 pts vs IWD −0.2 pts vs VONV
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.18%
Already in the S&P 500 84.3% 90.0%
Holdings 298 871
Net assets, as of Oct 27, 2026 $22.4bn $83.0bn

AVLV and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-03D36E4EEA

AVLV and IWD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. AVLV follows No index, actively managed and IWD follows Russell 1000 Value Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 33% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 AVLV returned +29.6% and IWD +27.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 2.1 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

AVLV and IWD flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
AVLV

AVLV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +29.6% with distributions reinvested, against +27.5% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 84% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 298 positions, with the top ten at 26.8%.

IWD

IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, AVLV or IWD?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, AVLV returned +29.6% and IWD +27.5%.
Which is cheaper, AVLV or IWD?
AVLV is cheaper, by 0.03 percentage points a year. That is about $3 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do AVLV and IWD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 84% of AVLV and 90% of IWD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, AVLV against IWD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/avlv-vs-iwd

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.