Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
FNDX vs IWD: Differences, Returns & Fees
Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, FNDX returned +23.9% to IWD's +27.5%; 62% of their weight is in the same names.
askIQ about this page
askIQ about FNDX and IWD
Net assets: $27.6bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab Fundamental U.S. Large Company ETF, and $83.0bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares Russell 1000 Value ETF.
Pair scorecard
IWD costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.6 points.
| Measure | FNDX | IWD |
|---|---|---|
| Return | ||
| Total return, 1 year | +23.9% | +27.5% |
| Benchmark | ||
| What it tracks | Fundamental U.S. Large Company | Russell 1000 Value Index |
| Cost and size | ||
| Expense ratio | 0.25% | 0.18% |
| Net assets, FNDX as of Aug 31, 2026 and IWD as of Oct 27, 2026 | $27.6bn | $83.0bn |
| Holdings | ||
| Holdings in common | 62% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 21.0% | 29.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method
What they share
By the books each fund has filed, FNDX and IWD hold 62% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.
half
62% in common
Only in one fund ↓
Side by side
FNDX and IWD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FNDX and IWD are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. FNDX follows Fundamental U.S. Large Company and IWD follows Russell 1000 Value Index.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 FNDX returned +23.9% and IWD +27.5% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 3.6 points.
- Holdings in common (similar). 62% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026).
Data as of Oct 28, 2026.
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
FNDX
FNDX tracks an index of Fundamental U.S. Large Company. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +23.9% with distributions reinvested, against +13.1% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 731 positions, with the top ten at 21.0%.
IWD
IWD tracks the Russell 1000 value. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +27.5% with distributions reinvested, against +27.7% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.18% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 871 positions, with the top ten at 29.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FNDX or IWD?
- In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FNDX returned +23.9% and IWD +27.5%.
- Which is cheaper, FNDX or IWD?
- IWD is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Links are sources, not endorsements. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FNDX against IWD, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-iwd
ETFIQ. (Oct 28, 2026). FNDX against IWD. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-iwd
[FNDX against IWD (ETFIQ, Oct 28, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fndx-vs-iwd)
Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.