Which returned more over the last year, JAVA or OAKM?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JAVA returned +20.3% and OAKM +14.8%.

Which is cheaper, JAVA or OAKM?

JAVA is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do JAVA and OAKM overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 90% of JAVA and 92% of OAKM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Ask IQ about these two funds

JAVA vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees

JAVA and OAKM hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and JAVA returned +20.3% over the year. Net assets: $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.

JAVA costs 0.15 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.5 points; JAVA is 6.4 times larger.

	JAVA	OAKM
Expense ratio	0.44%	0.59%
Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026	$6.7bn	$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year	+20.3%	+14.8%
What it tracks	No index, actively managed	No index, actively managed
Holdings in common	15%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	30.6%	37.0%
Below its high		6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+20.3%

JAVA total return, 1 year

+14.8%

OAKM total return, 1 year

0.44%

JAVA expense ratio

0.59%

OAKM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, JAVA and OAKM hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

15% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding JAVA OAKM

BANK OF AMERICA CORP 2.19% 3.42%

WELLS FARGO & CO COMMON 2.17% 2.13%

CONOCOPHILLIPS COMMON 1.82% 2.66%

CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 1.64% 2.93%

AMAZON.COM INC COMMON 7.76% 1.62%

CITIGROUP INC COMMON 1.39% 4.09%

CAPITAL ONE FINANCIAL 1.25% 3.56%

MERCK & CO INC COMMON 0.78% 3.35%

UNION PACIFIC CORP 0.58% 2.90%

ELEVANCE HEALTH INC 0.53% 3.38%

GE HEALTHCARE TECHNOLOGIES INC 0.49% 1.97%

ALPHABET INC-CL A 0.37% 0.74%

Only in JAVA

MICROSOFT CORP COMMON 6.31%

APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.93%

ABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK 1.82%

META PLATFORMS INC 1.55%

BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC 1.32%

HEWLETT PACKARD ENTERPRISE COMPANY 1.29%

JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.28%

MORGAN STANLEY DEAN 1.24%

Only in OAKM

Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 4.00%

Delta Air Lines Inc 3.89%

State Street Corp 3.87%

Targa Resources Corp 3.77%

Corteva Inc 3.52%

Airbnb Inc 3.47%

Willis Towers Watson PLC 3.12%

Salesforce Inc 3.03%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

JAVA

JPMorgan Active Value ETF

OAKM

Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer JPMorgan Oakmark

What it is Actively managed Actively managed

Total return, 1 year +20.3% +14.8%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +3.0 pts −2.5 pts

Expense ratio 0.44% 0.59%

Already in the S&P 500 90.4% 91.9%

Holdings 151 39

Net assets, JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 and OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 $7.2bn $1.0bn

JAVA and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

JAVA in plain words

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, JAVA or OAKM?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, JAVA returned +20.3% and OAKM +14.8%.
Which is cheaper, JAVA or OAKM?: JAVA is cheaper, by 0.15 percentage points a year. That is about $15 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do JAVA and OAKM overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 90% of JAVA and 92% of OAKM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

JAVA vs TVAL JAVA vs JVAL JAVA vs LGLV DUSA vs JAVA OAKM vs SPYD OAKM vs SPLV OAKM vs VLUE OAKM vs PRF

JAVA on its own →OAKM on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

JAVA filings on SEC EDGAR ↗JAVA prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗JPMorgan website ↗OAKM filings on SEC EDGAR ↗OAKM prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, JAVA against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/java-vs-oakm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.