FTCS vs OAKM: Differences, Returns & Fees
FTCS and OAKM hold 8% of their weight in the same names, and OAKM returned +14.8% over the year. Net assets: $7.5bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust Capital Strength ETF, and $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF.
FTCS costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 10.7 points; FTCS is 7.3 times larger.
| FTCS | OAKM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.53% | 0.59% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $7.6bn | $1.0bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +4.1% | +14.8% |
| What it tracks | not read by ETFIQ | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 8% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 22.6% | 37.0% |
| Below its high | 6.1%, high on Aug 24, 2026 | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FTCS and OAKM hold 8% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
8% in common
On the same fields
FTCS and OAKM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
FTCS in plain words
FTCS tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +4.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.53% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 50 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%. It sat 6.1% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FTCS or OAKM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FTCS returned +4.1% and OAKM +14.8%.
- Which is cheaper, FTCS or OAKM?
- FTCS is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FTCS against OAKM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-oakm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FTCS against OAKM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-oakm
[FTCS against OAKM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ftcs-vs-oakm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.