OAKM vs SPLV: Differences, Returns & Fees

OAKM and SPLV hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and OAKM returned +14.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, and $7.0bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF.

SPLV costs 0.34 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 12.8 points.

OAKMSPLV
Expense ratio0.59%0.25%
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SPLV as of Oct 9, 2026$1.0bn$7.0bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+2.0%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedS&P 500 Low Volatility Index
Holdings in common2%
Holdings datedJun 30, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.0%12.7%
Below its high6.4%, high on Sep 3, 20267.1%, high on Jul 28, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+14.8%
OAKM total return, 1 year
+2.0%
SPLV total return, 1 year
0.59%
OAKM expense ratio
0.25%
SPLV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OAKM and SPLV hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

2% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OAKM SPLV
Union Pacific Corp 2.90% 0.90%
Bank of America Corp 3.42% 0.81%
Only in OAKM
Citigroup Inc 4.09%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 4.00%
Delta Air Lines Inc 3.89%
State Street Corp 3.87%
Targa Resources Corp 3.77%
Capital One Financial Corp 3.56%
Corteva Inc 3.52%
Airbnb Inc 3.47%
Only in SPLV
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 1.44%
Evergy Inc 1.28%
WEC Energy Group Inc 1.27%
FirstEnergy Corp 1.27%
Duke Energy Corp 1.27%
Regency Centers Corp 1.25%
Atmos Energy Corp 1.25%
Pinnacle West Capital Corp 1.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
SPLV
Invesco S&P 500 Low Volatility ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +2.0%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts −15.3 pts
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 91.9% 98.7%
Holdings 39 108
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SPLV as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.0bn $7.0bn

OAKM and SPLV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SPLV in plain words

SPLV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +2.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 108 positions, with the top ten at 12.7%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jul 28, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OAKM or SPLV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OAKM returned +14.8% and SPLV +2.0%.
Which is cheaper, OAKM or SPLV?
SPLV is cheaper, by 0.34 percentage points a year. That is about $34 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OAKM and SPLV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of OAKM and 99% of SPLV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OAKM against SPLV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-splv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.