OAKM vs VTV: Differences, Returns & Fees
OAKM and VTV hold 11% of their weight in the same names, and VTV returned +21.0% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, and $184.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Value ETF.
VTV costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.2 points; VTV is far larger, $254.5bn against $1.0bn.
| OAKM | VTV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.59% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $1.0bn | $254.5bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.8% | +21.0% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | CRSP US Large Cap Value Index |
| Holdings in common | 11% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 37.0% | 22.6% |
| Below its high | 6.4%, high on Sep 3, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, OAKM and VTV hold 11% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
11% in common
On the same fields
OAKM and VTV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
OAKM in plain words
OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
VTV in plain words
VTV tracks an index of US value. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 308 positions, with the top ten at 22.6%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, OAKM or VTV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OAKM returned +14.8% and VTV +21.0%.
- Which is cheaper, OAKM or VTV?
- VTV is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, OAKM against VTV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-vtv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). OAKM against VTV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-vtv
[OAKM against VTV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-vtv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.