OAKM vs SCHD: Differences, Returns & Fees

OAKM and SCHD hold 7% of their weight in the same names, and SCHD returned +26.6% over the year. Net assets: $1.0bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF, and $94.9bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF.

SCHD costs 0.53 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.8 points.

OAKMSCHD
Expense ratio0.59%0.06%
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHD as of May 31, 2026$1.0bn$94.9bn
Total return, 1 year+14.8%+26.6%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Dividend 100 Index
Holdings in common7%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund37.0%43.6%
Below its high6.4%, high on Sep 3, 20265.4%, high on Aug 24, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

+14.8%
OAKM total return, 1 year
+26.6%
SCHD total return, 1 year
0.59%
OAKM expense ratio
0.06%
SCHD expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OAKM and SCHD hold 7% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.

half

7% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OAKM SCHD
Merck & Co Inc 3.35% 3.86%
ConocoPhillips 2.66% 3.51%
Accenture PLC 1.36% 2.90%
Only in OAKM
Citigroup Inc 4.09%
Keurig Dr Pepper Inc 4.00%
Delta Air Lines Inc 3.89%
State Street Corp 3.87%
Targa Resources Corp 3.77%
Capital One Financial Corp 3.56%
Corteva Inc 3.52%
Airbnb Inc 3.47%
Only in SCHD
QUALCOMM Inc 6.74%
Texas Instruments Inc 5.91%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 5.09%
Coca-Cola Co/The 3.96%
Chevron Corp 3.83%
Verizon Communications Inc 3.65%
Procter & Gamble Co/The 3.55%
Amgen Inc 3.47%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OAKM
Oakmark U.S. Large Cap ETF
SCHD
Schwab U.S. Dividend Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of US dividend
Total return, 1 year +14.8% +26.6%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 −2.5 pts +9.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.59% 0.06%
Already in the S&P 500 91.9% 94.9%
Holdings 39 99
Net assets, OAKM as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHD as of May 31, 2026 $1.0bn $94.9bn

OAKM and SCHD on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

OAKM in plain words

OAKM is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.59% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 39 positions, with the top ten at 37.0%. It sat 6.4% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

SCHD in plain words

SCHD tracks an index of US dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.06% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 99 positions, with the top ten at 43.6%. It sat 5.4% below its high of Aug 24, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OAKM or SCHD?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OAKM returned +14.8% and SCHD +26.6%.
Which is cheaper, OAKM or SCHD?
SCHD is cheaper, by 0.53 percentage points a year. That is about $53 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OAKM and SCHD overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 92% of OAKM and 95% of SCHD by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OAKM against SCHD, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oakm-vs-schd

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.