MTUM vs STXF: Differences, Returns & Fees
MTUM and STXF hold 30% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets: $20.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF, and $1.1bn on Jun 30, 2026 for Strive 500 ETF.
STXF costs 0.10 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.5 points; MTUM is far larger, $29.0bn against $1.1bn.
| MTUM | STXF | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.05% |
| Net assets, as of Jun 30, 2026 | $29.0bn | $1.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.8% | +17.3% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | Bloomberg 500 Index |
| Holdings in common | 30% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 36.2% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and STXF hold 30% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
30% in common
On the same fields
MTUM and STXF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About STXF
STXF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.3% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.05% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 500 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or STXF?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +25.8% and STXF +17.3%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or STXF?
- STXF is cheaper, by 0.10 percentage points a year. That is about $10 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against STXF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-stxf
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MTUM against STXF. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-stxf
[MTUM against STXF (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-stxf)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.