MTUM vs SFLR: Differences, Returns & Fees
MTUM and SFLR hold 25% of their weight in the same names, and MTUM returned +25.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $20.3bn for iShares MSCI USA Momentum Factor ETF and $2.3bn for Innovator Equity Managed Floor ETF.
MTUM costs 0.74 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 15.9 points; MTUM is 8.9 times larger.
| MTUM | SFLR | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.89% |
| Net assets | $20.3bn | $2.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +25.8% | +9.9% |
| What it tracks | MSCI USA Momentum SR Variant Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 25% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 36.1% | 37.9% |
| Below its high | 7.1%, high on Jun 22, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MTUM and SFLR hold 25% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
25% in common
On the same fields
MTUM and SFLR on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MTUM
MTUM tracks the MSCI USA Momentum Factor. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +25.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 126 positions, with the top ten at 36.1%. It sat 7.1% below its high of Jun 22, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About SFLR
SFLR is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +9.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.89% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 91% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 188 positions, with the top ten at 37.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MTUM or SFLR?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MTUM returned +25.8% and SFLR +9.9%.
- Which is cheaper, MTUM or SFLR?
- MTUM is cheaper, by 0.74 percentage points a year. That is about $74 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MTUM against SFLR, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sflr
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). MTUM against SFLR. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sflr
[MTUM against SFLR (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mtum-vs-sflr)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.