MAGS vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
MAGS and TGRW hold 20% of their weight in the same names, and MAGS returned +12.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $5.7bn for Roundhill Magnificent Seven ETF and $1.2bn for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF.
MAGS costs 0.22 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 9.6 points; MAGS is 5.0 times larger.
| MAGS | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.30% | 0.52% |
| Net assets | $5.7bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +12.2% | +2.6% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 20% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 29.3% | 58.8% |
| Below its high | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
MAGS and TGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- Holdings in common. 20% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 MAGS returned +12.2% and TGRW +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 9.6 points.
- Number of holdings. MAGS holds 8 positions and TGRW holds 80.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, MAGS and TGRW hold 20% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026.
half
20% in common
On the same fields
MAGS and TGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About MAGS
MAGS is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +12.2% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 8 positions, with the top ten at 29.3%.
About TGRW
TGRW is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.52% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, MAGS or TGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MAGS returned +12.2% and TGRW +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, MAGS or TGRW?
- MAGS is cheaper, by 0.22 percentage points a year. That is about $22 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, MAGS against TGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-tgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). MAGS against TGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-tgrw
[MAGS against TGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mags-vs-tgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.