SCHG vs TGRW: Differences, Returns & Fees
SCHG and TGRW hold 59% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned +10.4% over the year. Net assets: $61.1bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF, and $1.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for T. Rowe Price Growth Stock ETF.
SCHG costs 0.48 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.8 points.
| SCHG | TGRW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.04% | 0.52% |
| Net assets, SCHG as of May 31, 2026 and TGRW as of Oct 20, 2026 | $61.1bn | $1.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +10.4% | +2.6% |
| What it tracks | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 59% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 57.2% | 58.8% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | 5.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
SCHG and TGRW are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index and TGRW follows No index, actively managed.
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 SCHG returned +10.4% and TGRW +2.6% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.8 points.
- Cost. SCHG charges 0.04% of assets a year and TGRW 0.52%, a gap of 0.48 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, SCHG and TGRW hold 59% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jun 30, 2026.
half
59% in common
On the same fields
SCHG and TGRW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About TGRW
TGRW is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.52% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 93% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 80 positions, with the top ten at 58.8%. It sat 5.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.6% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, SCHG or TGRW?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, SCHG returned +10.4% and TGRW +2.6%.
- Which is cheaper, SCHG or TGRW?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.48 percentage points a year. That is about $48 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, SCHG against TGRW, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tgrw
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). SCHG against TGRW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tgrw
[SCHG against TGRW (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/schg-vs-tgrw)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.