Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to SCHG's +6.8%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and SCHG

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.50 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.2 points.

BOND vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.04%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$8.3bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight95%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026 · 763 weekly returns
BOND SCHG
Return
Total return edge SCHG +47.4% +842.2%
Annualized edge SCHG +2.7% +16.5%
Price return edge SCHG −12.6% +731.5%
Risk
Volatility edge BOND 4.9% 18.3%
Max drawdown edge BOND −19.5% −34.2%
Downside capture 95.5% 108.1%
Beta 0.97 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge SCHG 0.21 0.83
Sortino edge SCHG 0.28 1.25
Treynor 0.010 0.138
Calmar edge SCHG 0.14 0.48
Against the benchmark
Alpha +0.9% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 2.05 0.65
Information ratio 0.53 0.40
Tracking error 1.7% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: BOND against AGG, Mar 9, 2012 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

SCHG returned more: +842.2% to +47.4%. BOND swung less: 4.9% to 18.3%. BOND fell less at its worst: −19.5% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: BOND vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+47.4%+842.2%SCHGPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+2.7%+16.5%SCHGTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return−12.6%+731.5%SCHGPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility4.9%18.3%BONDSpread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation3.6%12.2%BONDLike volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−19.5%−34.2%BONDDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture102.2%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture95.5%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta0.971.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.880.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.210.83SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino0.281.25SCHGReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.0100.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.140.48SCHGAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkAGGIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+0.9% a year+0.8% a yearSCHG not significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat2.050.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range0.0% to +1.7%−1.7% to +3.4%SCHG includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.530.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error1.7%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 763 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and SCHG hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND SCHG
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in SCHG
NVIDIA Corp 10.67%
Apple Inc 9.29%
Microsoft Corp 7.52%
Amazon.com Inc 5.07%
Alphabet Inc 3.97%
Broadcom Inc 3.50%
Alphabet Inc 3.16%
Eli Lilly & Co 2.93%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
Issuer PIMCO Schwab
What it is Actively managed Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.04%
Holdings 1565 192
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $8.3bn $63.0bn

BOND and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-07935D09D5

BOND and SCHG do different jobs. What does each one do in a portfolio?

  1. What each follows. BOND follows No index, actively managed and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 0% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 BOND returned −1.4% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 8.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.50 percentage points a year. That is about $50 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.