Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

BOND vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, BOND returned −1.4% to ONEQ's +12.7%; 0% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about BOND and ONEQ

Net assets: $8.3bn on Jun 30, 2026 for PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund, and $10.9bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF.

At a glance
−1.4%
BOND total return, 1 year
+12.7%
ONEQ total return, 1 year
0.54%
BOND expense ratio
0.21%
ONEQ expense ratio

Pair scorecard

ONEQ costs 0.33 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 14.1 points.

BOND vs ONEQ: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureBONDONEQ
Return
Total return, 1 year−1.4%+12.7%
Drawdown
Below its high3.1%, high on Feb 27, 20263.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNasdaq Composite Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.54%0.21%
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026$8.3bn$10.9bn
Holdings
Holdings in common0%
In the S&P 500, by weight85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund56.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026. Method

What they share

0%

By the books each fund has filed, BOND and ONEQ hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

0% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first BOND ONEQ
Only in one fund ↓
Only in BOND
UMBS, TBA 5.56%
PIMCO Mortgage-Backed Securities Active Exchange-Traded Fund 4.07%
UMBS, TBA 3.46%
United States Treasury 3.40%
UMBS, TBA 2.73%
United States Treasury 2.57%
UMBS, TBA 2.54%
UMBS, TBA 2.27%
Only in ONEQ
NVIDIA CORP 11.57%
APPLE INC 10.08%
MICROSOFT CORP 8.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.05%
ALPHABET INC 4.28%
ALPHABET INC 3.96%
BROADCOM INC 3.80%
TESLA INC 2.99%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

BOND PIMCO Active Bond Exchange-Traded Fund ONEQ Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
Where it sits Bond ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Tracks the Nasdaq Composite
Total return, 1 year −1.4% +12.7%
Its benchmark over the same days −1.4% (AGG) not measured
Gap to its benchmark 0.0 pts vs AGG not measured
Expense ratio 0.54% 0.21%
Holdings 1565 1026
Net assets, BOND as of Jun 30, 2026 and ONEQ as of Sep 30, 2026 $8.3bn $10.9bn

BOND and ONEQ on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Alert

The week's ETF fund flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
BOND

BOND is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned −1.4% with distributions reinvested, against −1.4% for its benchmark, the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.54% a year. It sat 3.1% below its high of Feb 27, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

ONEQ

ONEQ tracks the Nasdaq Composite. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +12.7% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 85% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,026 positions, with the top ten at 56.0%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, BOND or ONEQ?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, BOND returned −1.4% and ONEQ +12.7%.
Which is cheaper, BOND or ONEQ?
ONEQ is cheaper, by 0.33 percentage points a year. That is about $33 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, BOND against ONEQ, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/bond-vs-oneq

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.