Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

vsCompare their flowsaskIQ about these two fundsAsk the committee about these two funds
Across categories

GARP vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees

Share
Share on XDownload as PDF

Over the year to Oct 28, 2026, GARP returned +18.0% to SCHG's +6.8%; 49% of their weight is in the same names.

askIQ about this page

askIQ about GARP and SCHG

Net assets: $3.6bn on Oct 27, 2026 for iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF, and $63.0bn on Aug 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.

At a glance
+18.0%
GARP total return, 1 year
+6.8%
SCHG total return, 1 year
0.15%
GARP expense ratio
0.04%
SCHG expense ratio

Pair scorecard

SCHG costs 0.11 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 11.2 points.

GARP vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPSCHG
Return
Total return, 1 year+18.0%+6.8%
Drawdown
Below its high7.0%, high on Oct 6, 20263.5%, high on Oct 6, 2026
Benchmark
What it tracksMSCI USA Quality GARP Select IndexDow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index
Cost and size
Expense ratio0.15%0.04%
Net assets, GARP as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026$3.6bn$63.0bn
Holdings
Holdings in common49%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund43.5%51.0%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026. Method

Risk and return

Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026 · 352 weekly returns
GARP SCHG
Return
Total return edge GARP +232.4% +196.9%
Annualized edge GARP +19.4% +17.4%
Price return edge GARP +215.4% +187.2%
Risk
Volatility edge GARP (slight) 22.3% 22.9%
Max drawdown edge GARP −30.1% −34.2%
Downside capture 109.0% 108.1%
Beta 1.10 1.10
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe edge GARP 0.78 0.69
Sortino edge GARP 1.16 1.04
Treynor 0.157 0.138
Calmar edge GARP 0.65 0.51
Against the benchmark
Alpha +3.4% a year +0.8% a year
Alpha t-stat 1.15 0.65
Information ratio 0.59 0.40
Tracking error 7.9% 5.5%

Each against its own benchmark: GARP against PBUS, Jan 24, 2020 to Oct 23, 2026; SCHG against IVV, Dec 18, 2009 to Oct 23, 2026.

Reading

GARP returned more: +232.4% to +196.9%. GARP swung slightly less: 22.3% to 22.9%. GARP fell less at its worst: −30.1% to −34.2%.

Full scorecard

19 measures, with how each is measured
Open ↓
Risk and return: GARP vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
MeasureGARPSCHGEdgeHow it is measured
Return
Total return+232.4%+196.9%GARPPrice change plus distributions, reinvested.
Annualized+19.4%+17.4%GARPTotal return as a yearly rate.
Price return+215.4%+187.2%GARPPrice change alone, distributions left out.
Risk
Volatility22.3%22.9%GARP (slight)Spread of weekly returns, annualized. Lower is steadier.
Downside deviation14.9%15.2%GARP (slight)Like volatility, counting only weeks below the Treasury bill rate.
Max drawdown−30.1%−34.2%GARPDeepest fall from a high to the low after it.
Upside capture133.9%121.1%Share of its benchmark's rise caught in the weeks it rose.
Downside capture109.0%108.1%Share of its benchmark's fall taken in the weeks it fell. Lower is better.
Beta1.101.10Not an edgeHow far it moves for each 1% its benchmark moves.
R squared0.880.92Not an edgeShare of its weekly moves its benchmark explains.
Risk-adjusted
Sharpe0.780.69GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of volatility.
Sortino1.161.04GARPReturn above Treasury bills per unit of downside deviation.
Treynor0.1570.138Return above Treasury bills per unit of beta.
Calmar0.650.51GARPAnnualized return divided by the max drawdown.
Against the benchmark
BenchmarkPBUSIVVThe ETF each fund is measured against.
Alpha+3.4% a year+0.8% a yearNot significantYearly return beyond what its beta to the benchmark predicts.
Alpha t-stat1.150.65Not an edgeHow sure the alpha is. Below 2, it could be chance.
Alpha range−2.4% to +9.2%−1.7% to +3.4%Includes zeroThe 95% range for the yearly alpha.
Information ratio0.590.40Return against its benchmark per unit of tracking error.
Tracking error7.9%5.5%Not an edgeHow far weekly returns stray from the benchmark, annualized.

Computed by ETFIQ from Tiingo daily prices and ETFIQ's distribution records, 352 weekly returns. Cash rate: the 13-week Treasury bill.

What they share

49%

By the books each fund has filed, GARP and SCHG hold 49% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 27, 2026.

0 half 100%

half

49% in common

Positions both hold · largest shared weight first GARP SCHG
MICROSOFT 5.67% 7.52%
APPLE 5.66% 9.29%
NVIDIA 5.18% 10.67%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 4.72% 2.51%
VISA CLASS A 5.13% 2.43%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.24% 3.97%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.12% 3.16%
AMAZON.COM INC 2.12% 5.07%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 2.01% 2.37%
ELI LILLY 1.78% 2.93%
BROADCOM INC 1.70% 3.50%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 2.86% 1.65%
Only in one fund ↓
Only in GARP
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 4.61%
LAM RESEARCH 3.31%
CATERPILLAR INC 3.29%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 2.07%
MERCADOLIBRE 1.86%
ROYAL CARIBBEAN GROUP 1.83%
INTEL CORPORATION 1.81%
WESTERN DIGITAL CORP 1.73%
Only in SCHG
Tesla Inc 2.37%
Costco Wholesale Corp 1.61%
UnitedHealth Group Inc 1.36%
General Electric Co 1.35%
Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc 0.88%
Linde PLC 0.87%
Salesforce Inc 0.81%
Walt Disney Co 0.72%
Check overlap with more funds →

Side by side

GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF SCHG Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth
Total return, 1 year +18.0% +6.8%
Its benchmark over the same days +13.3% (PBUS) +13.7% (IVV)
Gap to its benchmark +4.7 pts vs PBUS −6.9 pts vs IVV
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.04%
Already in the S&P 500 94.4% 94.7%
Holdings 131 192
Net assets, GARP as of Oct 27, 2026 and SCHG as of Aug 31, 2026 $3.6bn $63.0bn

GARP and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 28, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

Client brief · page 1 of 2 Report BR-CE548C0F49

GARP and SCHG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?

  1. What each follows. GARP follows MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
  2. Holdings in common. 49% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 27, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026).
  3. One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 28, 2026 GARP returned +18.0% and SCHG +6.8% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 11.2 points.

Data as of Oct 28, 2026.

The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.

Your saved page · Privacy.

Alert

GARP flows, by email on Sundays.

One-click unsubscribe. See Privacy.

About each fund
GARP

GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +13.3% for its benchmark, the MSCI USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 27, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 131 positions, with the top ten at 43.5%. It sat 7.0% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

SCHG

SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 28, 2026 it returned +6.8% with distributions reinvested, against +13.7% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for Aug 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 192 positions, with the top ten at 51.0%. It sat 3.5% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 28, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GARP or SCHG?
In the year to Oct 28, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GARP returned +18.0% and SCHG +6.8%.
Which is cheaper, GARP or SCHG?
SCHG is cheaper, by 0.11 percentage points a year. That is about $11 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GARP and SCHG overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 94% of GARP and 95% of SCHG by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GARP against SCHG, data as of Oct 28, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/garp-vs-schg

Open data →

Free to use with attribution for data ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.