QGRO vs SCHG: Differences, Returns & Fees
QGRO and SCHG hold 29% of their weight in the same names, and SCHG returned +10.4% over the year. Net assets on May 31, 2026: $2.2bn for American Century U.S. Quality Growth ETF and $61.1bn for Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth ETF.
SCHG costs 0.25 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.6 points; SCHG is far larger, $61.1bn against $2.2bn.
| QGRO | SCHG | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.29% | 0.04% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $2.2bn | $61.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +2.8% | +10.4% |
| What it tracks | American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index | Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 29% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 30.9% | 57.2% |
| Below its high | 3.8%, high on Oct 6, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
QGRO and SCHG are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. QGRO follows American Century U.S. Quality Growth Index and SCHG follows Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Growth Total Stock Market Index.
- Holdings in common. 29% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated May 31, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 QGRO returned +2.8% and SCHG +10.4% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.6 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, QGRO and SCHG hold 29% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
29% in common
On the same fields
QGRO and SCHG on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About QGRO
QGRO tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 80% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 189 positions, with the top ten at 30.9%.
Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +2.8% with distributions reinvested, against +4.0% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Growth.
About SCHG
SCHG tracks an index of U.S. Large-Cap Growth. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +10.4% with distributions reinvested, against +15.8% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.04% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 95% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 57.2%. It sat 3.8% below its high of Oct 6, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, QGRO or SCHG?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, QGRO returned +2.8% and SCHG +10.4%.
- Which is cheaper, QGRO or SCHG?
- SCHG is cheaper, by 0.25 percentage points a year. That is about $25 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, QGRO against SCHG, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-schg
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). QGRO against SCHG. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-schg
[QGRO against SCHG (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/qgro-vs-schg)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.