LRGC vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
LRGC and VV hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and VV returned +17.1% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.
VV costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.7 points.
| LRGC | VV | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, LRGC as of Oct 8, 2026 and VV as of Sep 30, 2026 | $1.4bn | $54.1bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +17.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | CRSP US Large Cap Index |
| Holdings in common | 45% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 45.1% | 38.2% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LRGC and VV hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Aug 31, 2026.
half
45% in common
On the same fields
LRGC and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About LRGC
LRGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 45.1%.
About VV
VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LRGC or VV?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LRGC returned +13.4% and VV +17.1%.
- Which is cheaper, LRGC or VV?
- VV is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LRGC against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-vv
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). LRGC against VV. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-vv
[LRGC against VV (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-vv)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.