LRGC vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
LRGC and SCHB hold 42% of their weight in the same names, and SCHB returned +16.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.4bn on Oct 8, 2026 for AB US Large Cap Strategic Equities ETF, and $43.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.
SCHB costs 0.36 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.4 points; SCHB is far larger, $43.3bn against $1.3bn.
| LRGC | SCHB | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.39% | 0.03% |
| Net assets, as of May 31, 2026 | $1.3bn | $43.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +13.4% | +16.8% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | Dow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index |
| Holdings in common | 42% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 45.1% | 34.9% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, LRGC and SCHB hold 42% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026.
half
42% in common
On the same fields
LRGC and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About LRGC
LRGC is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +13.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for its benchmark, the S&P 500 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.39% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 94% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 69 positions, with the top ten at 45.1%.
About SCHB
SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,405 positions, with the top ten at 34.9%.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, LRGC or SCHB?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, LRGC returned +13.4% and SCHB +16.8%.
- Which is cheaper, LRGC or SCHB?
- SCHB is cheaper, by 0.36 percentage points a year. That is about $36 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, LRGC against SCHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-schb
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). LRGC against SCHB. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-schb
[LRGC against SCHB (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/lrgc-vs-schb)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.