IXC vs MLPA: Differences, Returns & Fees

IXC and MLPA hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and IXC returned +50.0% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.1bn for iShares Global Energy ETF and $2.3bn for Global X MLP ETF.

IXC costs 0.40 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 26.8 points; IXC is 1.4 times larger.

IXCMLPA
Expense ratio0.37%0.77%
Net assets$3.1bn$2.3bn
Total return, 1 year+50.0%+23.2%
What it tracksS&P Global 1200 Energy 4not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund60.1%98.6%
Below its high6.5%, high on Sep 9, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+50.0%
IXC total return, 1 year
+23.2%
MLPA total return, 1 year
0.37%
IXC expense ratio
0.77%
MLPA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IXC and MLPA hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IXC MLPA
ONEOK 1.47% 0.00%
Only in IXC
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 17.84%
CHEVRON 10.76%
SHELL 7.44%
TOTALENERGIES 4.55%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 4.15%
MARATHON PETROLEUM 3.35%
VALERO ENERGY CORP 3.29%
BP PLC 3.13%
Only in MLPA
ENERGY TRANSFER LP 15.50%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS 13.25%
MPLX LP 12.42%
PLAINS ALL AMER PIPELINE LP 11.78%
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L 10.39%
SUNOCO LP 9.66%
HESS MIDSTREAM LP - CLASS A 7.71%
CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS LP 7.38%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IXC
iShares Global Energy ETF
MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +50.0% +23.2%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +32.7 pts +6.0 pts
Expense ratio 0.37% 0.77%
Already in the S&P 500 59.6% 0.0%
Holdings 52 20
Net assets $3.1bn $2.3bn

IXC and MLPA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IXC in plain words

IXC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +50.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.37% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 60% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 52 positions, with the top ten at 60.1%.

MLPA in plain words

MLPA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.77% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 20 positions, with the top ten at 98.6%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IXC or MLPA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IXC returned +50.0% and MLPA +23.2%.
Which is cheaper, IXC or MLPA?
IXC is cheaper, by 0.40 percentage points a year. That is about $40 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IXC and MLPA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 60% of IXC and 0% of MLPA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IXC against MLPA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ixc-vs-mlpa

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.