MLPA vs OIH: Differences, Returns & Fees

MLPA and OIH hold 0% of their weight in the same names, and OIH returned +53.8% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.3bn for Global X MLP ETF and $1.9bn for VanEck Oil Services ETF.

OIH costs 0.42 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 30.6 points; MLPA is 1.2 times larger.

MLPAOIH
Expense ratio0.77%0.35%
Net assets$2.3bn$1.9bn
Total return, 1 year+23.2%+53.8%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQMVIS US Listed Oil Services 25 Index
Holdings in common0%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund98.6%71.3%
Below its high6.5%, high on Sep 9, 202658.3%, high on Jun 30, 2014

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+23.2%
MLPA total return, 1 year
+53.8%
OIH total return, 1 year
0.77%
MLPA expense ratio
0.35%
OIH expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, MLPA and OIH hold 0% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

0% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding MLPA OIH
Only in MLPA
ENERGY TRANSFER LP 15.50%
ENTERPRISE PRODUCTS PARTNERS 13.25%
MPLX LP 12.42%
PLAINS ALL AMER PIPELINE LP 11.78%
WESTERN MIDSTREAM PARTNERS L 10.39%
SUNOCO LP 9.66%
HESS MIDSTREAM LP - CLASS A 7.71%
CHENIERE ENERGY PARTNERS LP 7.38%
Only in OIH
Schlumberger Nv 19.04%
Baker Hughes Co 11.69%
Technipfmc Plc 6.60%
Halliburton Co 6.26%
Tenaris Sa 5.45%
Solaris Energy Infrastructure Inc 5.32%
Transocean Ltd 4.84%
Weatherford International Plc 4.12%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

MLPA
Global X MLP ETF
OIH
VanEck Oil Services ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +23.2% +53.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +6.0 pts +36.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.77% 0.35%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 37.3%
Holdings 20 25
Net assets $2.3bn $1.9bn

MLPA and OIH on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

MLPA in plain words

MLPA tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.77% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 20 positions, with the top ten at 98.6%. It sat 6.5% below its high of Sep 9, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

OIH in plain words

OIH tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +53.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.35% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 37% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 25 positions, with the top ten at 71.3%. It sat 58.3% below its high of Jun 30, 2014 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, MLPA or OIH?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, MLPA returned +23.2% and OIH +53.8%.
Which is cheaper, MLPA or OIH?
OIH is cheaper, by 0.42 percentage points a year. That is about $42 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do MLPA and OIH overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of MLPA and 37% of OIH by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, MLPA against OIH, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/mlpa-vs-oih

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.