IWX vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWX and JAVA hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and IWX returned +28.9% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $3.3bn for iShares Russell Top 200 Value ETF and $7.2bn for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.
IWX costs 0.24 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 8.6 points; JAVA is 2.1 times larger.
| IWX | JAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.20% | 0.44% |
| Net assets | $3.3bn | $7.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +28.9% | +20.3% |
| What it tracks | Russell Top 200 Value Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 55% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 41.1% | 30.6% |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IWX and JAVA hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.
half
55% in common
On the same fields
IWX and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IWX
IWX tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +28.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 153 positions, with the top ten at 41.1%.
About JAVA
JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IWX or JAVA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWX returned +28.9% and JAVA +20.3%.
- Which is cheaper, IWX or JAVA?
- IWX is cheaper, by 0.24 percentage points a year. That is about $24 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IWX against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-java
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). IWX against JAVA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-java
[IWX against JAVA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwx-vs-java)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.