DFUV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees

DFUV and JAVA hold 33% of their weight in the same names, and DFUV returned +26.8% over the year. Net assets: $15.4bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.

DFUV costs 0.23 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.5 points.

DFUV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFUVJAVA
Expense ratio0.21%0.44%
Net assets, DFUV as of Jul 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026$15.4bn$7.2bn
Total return, 1 year+26.8%+20.3%
What it tracksNo index, actively managedNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common33%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund25.9%30.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+26.8%
DFUV total return, 1 year
+20.3%
JAVA total return, 1 year
0.21%
DFUV expense ratio
0.44%
JAVA expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, DFUV and JAVA hold 33% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

33% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding DFUV JAVA
AMAZON.COM, INC. 3.47% 7.76%
BANK OF AMERICA CORPORATION 1.33% 2.19%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC. 2.72% 1.32%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 2.86% 1.28%
CHEVRON CORPORATION 2.00% 1.22%
UNITEDHEALTH GROUP INCORPORATED 1.42% 1.18%
WELLS FARGO & COMPANY 0.99% 2.17%
RTX CORPORATION 1.07% 0.97%
CONOCOPHILLIPS 0.82% 1.82%
MERCK & CO., INC. 0.83% 0.78%
THERMO FISHER SCIENTIFIC INCORPORATED 0.77% 0.94%
ANALOG DEVICES, INC. 0.76% 0.91%
Only in DFUV
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. 4.50%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY, INC. 2.86%
CISCO SYSTEMS, INC. 1.50%
LINDE PUBLIC LIMITED COMPANY 1.20%
VERIZON COMMUNICATIONS INC. 1.17%
PFIZER INC. 0.75%
UBER TECHNOLOGIES, INC. 0.58%
NEWMONT CORPORATION 0.58%
Only in JAVA
MICROSOFT CORP COMMON 6.31%
APPLE INC COMMON STOCK 3.93%
ABBVIE INC COMMON STOCK 1.82%
CHARLES SCHWAB CORP/THE 1.64%
NEXTERA ENERGY INC 1.18%
PHILIP MORRIS INTERNATIONAL INC 1.12%
AUTOZONE INC COMMON 1.00%
NVIDIA CORP COMMON STOCK 0.84%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

DFUV
Dimensional US Marketwide Value ETF
JAVA
JPMorgan Active Value ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Actively managed Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +26.8% +20.3%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +26.4% (IWD)
Gap to its benchmark not available −6.2 pts vs IWD
Expense ratio 0.21% 0.44%
Already in the S&P 500 79.0% 90.4%
Holdings 1332 151
Net assets, DFUV as of Jul 31, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 $15.4bn $7.2bn

DFUV and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About DFUV

DFUV is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +26.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.21% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,332 positions, with the top ten at 25.9%.

About JAVA

JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.

Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, DFUV or JAVA?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFUV returned +26.8% and JAVA +20.3%.
Which is cheaper, DFUV or JAVA?
DFUV is cheaper, by 0.23 percentage points a year. That is about $23 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do DFUV and JAVA overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 79% of DFUV and 90% of JAVA by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, DFUV against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfuv-vs-java

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.