FDVV vs JAVA: Differences, Returns & Fees
FDVV and JAVA hold 26% of their weight in the same names, and JAVA returned +20.3% over the year. Net assets: $10.2bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Fidelity High Dividend ETF, and $7.2bn on Oct 9, 2026 for JPMorgan Active Value ETF.
FDVV costs 0.29 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.2 points.
| FDVV | JAVA | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.15% | 0.44% |
| Net assets, FDVV as of Sep 30, 2026 and JAVA as of Oct 9, 2026 | $10.2bn | $7.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +14.1% | +20.3% |
| What it tracks | Fidelity High Dividend Index | No index, actively managed |
| Holdings in common | 26% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 33.8% | 30.6% |
| Below its high | 3.6%, high on Aug 13, 2026 | |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, FDVV and JAVA hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.
half
26% in common
On the same fields
FDVV and JAVA on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About FDVV
FDVV tracks an index of High Dividend. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +14.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 87% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 95 positions, with the top ten at 33.8%. It sat 3.6% below its high of Aug 13, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
About JAVA
JAVA is actively managed and tracks no index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.44% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 90% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 151 positions, with the top ten at 30.6%.
Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +20.3% with distributions reinvested, against +26.4% for its benchmark, the Russell 1000 Value Index.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, FDVV or JAVA?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, FDVV returned +14.1% and JAVA +20.3%.
- Which is cheaper, FDVV or JAVA?
- FDVV is cheaper, by 0.29 percentage points a year. That is about $29 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, FDVV against JAVA, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-java
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). FDVV against JAVA. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-java
[FDVV against JAVA (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/fdvv-vs-java)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.