IWV vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and VV hold 87% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.

VV costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.4 points; VV is 2.7 times larger.

IWV vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVVV
Expense ratio0.20%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$20.3bn$54.1bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+17.1%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexCRSP US Large Cap Index
Holdings in common87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%38.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VV total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.03%
VV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and VV hold 87% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

87% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV VV
NVIDIA 7.15% 7.84%
APPLE 6.51% 7.19%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 5.82%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 3.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 3.08%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 2.71%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.42%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 1.94%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.67%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.60%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.37%
ELI LILLY 1.26% 1.51%
Only in IWV
MODERNA 0.11%
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.11%
NATERA 0.07%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.07%
VYLOR 0.07%
ANGLOGOLD ASHANTI PLC 0.06%
EVERPURE INC CLASS A 0.06%
ILLUMINA INC 0.06%
Only in VV
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%
MKTLIQ 0.14%
Warner Bros Discovery Inc 0.10%
TE Connectivity PLC 0.09%
Berkshire Hathaway Inc 0.07%
Waste Connections Inc 0.07%
Cerebras Systems Inc 0.01%
SLBBH1142 0.00%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
VV
Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +17.1%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 98.0%
Holdings 2600 434
Net assets, IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and VV as of Sep 30, 2026 $20.6bn $54.1bn

IWV and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About VV

VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or VV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and VV +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or VV?
VV is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and VV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 98% of VV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-vv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.