IWV vs SCHK: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWV and SCHK hold 84% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $20.6bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell 3000 ETF, and $5.7bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab 1000 Index ETF.

SCHK costs 0.17 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.2 points; IWV is 3.8 times larger.

IWV vs SCHK: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWVSCHK
Expense ratio0.20%0.03%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$15.5bn$4.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.7%+16.9%
What it tracksRussell 3000 IndexSchwab 1000 Index
Holdings in common84%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund34.7%36.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
+16.9%
SCHK total return, 1 year
0.20%
IWV expense ratio
0.03%
SCHK expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWV and SCHK hold 84% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

84% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWV SCHK
NVIDIA 7.15% 7.29%
APPLE 6.51% 6.51%
MICROSOFT 5.32% 4.75%
AMAZON.COM INC 3.40% 3.75%
ALPHABET CLASS A 2.74% 3.15%
BROADCOM INC 2.25% 3.01%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.21% 2.50%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11% 1.97%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55% 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.49% 1.74%
ELI LILLY 1.26% 1.24%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28% 1.24%
Only in IWV
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 0.93%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.54%
GE AEROSPACE 0.43%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.35%
SANDISK 0.31%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.22%
TJX 0.20%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.16%
Only in SCHK
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.86%
Applied Materials Inc 0.51%
General Electric Co 0.48%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.39%
Sandisk Corp/DE 0.35%
McDonald's Corp 0.28%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.27%
TJX Cos Inc/The 0.24%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
SCHK
Schwab 1000 Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.7% +16.9%
Its benchmark over the same days +16.8% (VTHR) not published
Gap to its benchmark −0.1 pts vs VTHR not available
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 87.8% 92.3%
Holdings 2600 986
Net assets, IWV as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHK as of May 31, 2026 $20.6bn $5.7bn

IWV and SCHK on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

About SCHK

SCHK tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 92% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 986 positions, with the top ten at 36.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWV or SCHK?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWV returned +16.7% and SCHK +16.9%.
Which is cheaper, IWV or SCHK?
SCHK is cheaper, by 0.17 percentage points a year. That is about $17 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWV and SCHK overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 88% of IWV and 92% of SCHK by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWV against SCHK, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwv-vs-schk

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.