IWL vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWL and VV hold 87% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF, and $54.1bn on Sep 30, 2026 for Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF.

VV costs 0.12 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; VV is far larger, $54.1bn against $2.2bn.

IWL vs VV: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWLVV
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Sep 30, 2026$2.2bn$54.1bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+17.1%
What it tracksRussell Top 200 IndexCRSP US Large Cap Index
Holdings in common87%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.6%38.2%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
IWL total return, 1 year
+17.1%
VV total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWL expense ratio
0.03%
VV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWL and VV hold 87% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Aug 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

87% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWL VV
NVIDIA 9.18% 7.84%
APPLE 8.35% 7.19%
MICROSOFT 6.82% 5.82%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.37% 3.88%
ALPHABET CLASS A 3.52% 3.08%
BROADCOM INC 2.89% 2.71%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.84% 2.42%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.71% 1.94%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.99% 1.67%
TESLA INC 1.92% 1.60%
ELI LILLY 1.62% 1.51%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.53% 1.47%
Only in IWL
SPOTIFY TECHNOLOGY 0.14%
NU HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.10%
BROOKFIELD ASSET MANAGEMENT VOTING 0.03%
SOUTHERN COPPER CORP 0.03%
MOBILITY GLOBAL INC 0.01%
S&P500 EMINI DEC 26 0.00%
Only in VV
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.29%
Snowflake Inc 0.17%
Marathon Petroleum Corp 0.17%
Phillips 66 0.15%
Cloudflare Inc 0.15%
MKTLIQ 0.14%
Robinhood Markets Inc 0.13%
Datadog Inc 0.12%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
VV
Vanguard Morningstar Large-Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +17.1%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 99.2% 98.0%
Holdings 202 434
Net assets, IWL as of Oct 9, 2026 and VV as of Sep 30, 2026 $2.3bn $54.1bn

IWL and VV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWL

IWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 202 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

About VV

VV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +17.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer as of Aug 31, 2026, 98% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 434 positions, with the top ten at 38.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWL or VV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWL returned +16.8% and VV +17.1%.
Which is cheaper, IWL or VV?
VV is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWL and VV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWL and 98% of VV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWL against VV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwl-vs-vv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.