IWL vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWL and SCHB hold 72% of their weight in the same names. Net assets: $2.3bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF, and $43.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF.

SCHB costs 0.12 points a year less; both returned +16.8% over a year; SCHB is 19.7 times larger.

IWL vs SCHB: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWLSCHB
Expense ratio0.15%0.03%
Net assets, as of Feb 28, 2025$1.7bn$32.9bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+16.8%
What it tracksRussell Top 200 IndexDow Jones U.S. Broad Stock Market Index
Holdings in common72%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.6%34.9%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
IWL total return, 1 year
+16.8%
SCHB total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWL expense ratio
0.03%
SCHB expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWL and SCHB hold 72% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

72% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWL SCHB
NVIDIA 9.18% 7.02%
APPLE 8.35% 6.26%
MICROSOFT 6.82% 4.57%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.37% 3.62%
ALPHABET CLASS A 3.52% 3.03%
BROADCOM INC 2.89% 2.90%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.84% 2.41%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.71% 1.89%
TESLA INC 1.92% 1.68%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.99% 1.49%
ELI LILLY 1.62% 1.20%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.65% 1.19%
Only in IWL
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.19%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.69%
GE AEROSPACE 0.55%
TEXAS INSTRUMENT INC 0.44%
SANDISK 0.40%
MCDONALDS CORP 0.29%
TJX 0.26%
PROLOGIS REIT 0.21%
Only in SCHB
Exxon Mobil Corp 0.83%
Applied Materials Inc 0.49%
General Electric Co 0.46%
Texas Instruments Inc 0.38%
Sandisk Corp/DE 0.34%
McDonald's Corp 0.27%
Seagate Technology Holdings PLC 0.26%
TJX Cos Inc/The 0.23%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
SCHB
Schwab U.S. Broad Market ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index of US broad market
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +16.8%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.03%
Already in the S&P 500 99.2% 88.8%
Holdings 202 2405
Net assets, IWL as of Oct 9, 2026 and SCHB as of May 31, 2026 $2.3bn $43.3bn

IWL and SCHB on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWL

IWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 202 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

About SCHB

SCHB tracks an index of US broad market. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.03% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 89% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,405 positions, with the top ten at 34.9%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWL or SCHB?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWL returned +16.8% and SCHB +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWL or SCHB?
SCHB is cheaper, by 0.12 percentage points a year. That is about $12 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWL and SCHB overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWL and 89% of SCHB by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWL against SCHB, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwl-vs-schb

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.