A
vs
B
Share
Compare their flowsAsk IQ about these two funds

IWL vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees

IWL and OEF hold 85% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $2.3bn for iShares Russell Top 200 ETF and $20.8bn for iShares S&P 100 ETF.

IWL costs 0.05 points a year less; both returned +16.8% over a year; OEF is 9.1 times larger.

IWL vs OEF: Differences, Returns & Fees
IWLOEF
Expense ratio0.15%0.20%
Net assets$2.3bn$20.8bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+16.8%
What it tracksRussell Top 200 IndexS&P 100
Holdings in common85%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund44.6%52.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
IWL total return, 1 year
+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
0.15%
IWL expense ratio
0.20%
OEF expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IWL and OEF hold 85% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

85% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IWL OEF
NVIDIA 9.18% 11.11%
APPLE 8.35% 9.84%
MICROSOFT 6.82% 7.96%
AMAZON.COM INC 4.37% 5.16%
ALPHABET CLASS A 3.52% 4.13%
BROADCOM INC 2.89% 3.45%
ALPHABET CLASS C 2.84% 3.31%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.71% 3.17%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.99% 2.33%
TESLA INC 1.92% 2.16%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.70% 1.99%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.65% 1.92%
Only in IWL
CROWDSTRIKE HOLDINGS CLASS A 0.47%
KLA 0.44%
MARVELL TECHNOLOGY 0.41%
AMPHENOL CORP CLASS A 0.37%
ANALOG DEVICES 0.34%
EATON PLC 0.29%
WELLTOWER 0.28%
TJX 0.26%
Only in OEF

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IWL
iShares Russell Top 200 ETF
OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
Issuer iShares iShares
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +16.8%
Expense ratio 0.15% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 99.2% 99.9%
Holdings 202 102
Net assets $2.3bn $20.8bn

IWL and OEF on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IWL

IWL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.15% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 99% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 202 positions, with the top ten at 44.6%.

About OEF

OEF tracks an index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IWL or OEF?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IWL returned +16.8% and OEF +16.8%.
Which is cheaper, IWL or OEF?
IWL is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IWL and OEF overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 99% of IWL and 100% of OEF by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
CGDV vs IWLIWL vs SCHBIWL vs QUALIWL vs VVOEF vs TILTOEF vs TMFCOEF vs USPXJPEF vs OEF
IWL on its own →OEF on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →
Where these figures came from
IWL and OEF filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IWL and OEF prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for IWL ↗iShares page for OEF ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IWL against OEF, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/iwl-vs-oef

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.