OEF vs QLC: Differences, Returns & Fees

OEF and QLC hold 55% of their weight in the same names, and QLC returned +19.8% over the year. Net assets: $20.8bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares S&P 100 ETF, and $1.0bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF.

OEF costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 3.0 points; OEF is 19.5 times larger.

OEF vs QLC: Differences, Returns & Fees
OEFQLC
Expense ratio0.20%0.25%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$19.8bn$1.0bn
Total return, 1 year+16.8%+19.8%
What it tracksS&P 100Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index
Holdings in common55%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund52.6%37.6%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+16.8%
OEF total return, 1 year
+19.8%
QLC total return, 1 year
0.20%
OEF expense ratio
0.25%
QLC expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, OEF and QLC hold 55% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

55% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding OEF QLC
APPLE 9.84% 7.33%
NVIDIA 11.11% 7.10%
MICROSOFT 7.96% 4.25%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.13% 4.09%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.31% 3.66%
BROADCOM INC 3.45% 2.94%
AMAZON.COM INC 5.16% 2.59%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 1.77% 1.98%
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 3.17% 1.40%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.92% 1.27%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.26% 1.81%
ELI LILLY 1.89% 1.12%
Only in OEF
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.39%
VISA CLASS A 1.32%
WALMART 0.99%
MASTERCARD CLASS A 0.95%
CHEVRON 0.84%
COSTCO WHOLESALE CORP 0.84%
APPLIED MATERIAL INC 0.81%
COCA-COLA 0.68%
Only in QLC
Applied Materials, Inc. 1.15%
KLA Corp. 1.08%
McKesson Corp. 0.76%
Valero Energy Corp. 0.73%
Newmont Corp. 0.73%
Western Digital Corp. 0.70%
State Street Corp. 0.65%
Jones Lang LaSalle, Inc. 0.63%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

OEF
iShares S&P 100 ETF
QLC
Northern Trust US Quality Large Cap ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +16.8% +19.8%
Expense ratio 0.20% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 99.9% 96.4%
Holdings 102 177
Net assets, OEF as of Oct 9, 2026 and QLC as of Jul 31, 2026 $20.8bn $1.0bn

OEF and QLC on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About OEF

OEF tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 100% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 102 positions, with the top ten at 52.6%.

About QLC

QLC tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.8% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 96% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 177 positions, with the top ten at 37.6%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, OEF or QLC?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, OEF returned +16.8% and QLC +19.8%.
Which is cheaper, OEF or QLC?
OEF is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do OEF and QLC overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 100% of OEF and 96% of QLC by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, OEF against QLC, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/oef-vs-qlc

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.