IOO vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees

IOO and IWV hold 45% of their weight in the same names, and IOO returned +21.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $9.4bn for iShares Global 100 ETF and $20.6bn for iShares Russell 3000 ETF.

IWV costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.4 points; IWV is 2.2 times larger.

IOO vs IWV: Differences, Returns & Fees
IOOIWV
Expense ratio0.40%0.20%
Net assets$9.4bn$20.6bn
Total return, 1 year+21.1%+16.7%
What it tracksS&P Global 100Russell 3000 Index
Holdings in common45%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund59.9%34.7%

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

+21.1%
IOO total return, 1 year
+16.7%
IWV total return, 1 year
0.40%
IOO expense ratio
0.20%
IWV expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IOO and IWV hold 45% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 9, 2026.

half

45% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IOO IWV
NVIDIA 13.21% 7.15%
APPLE 11.70% 6.51%
MICROSOFT 9.46% 5.32%
AMAZON.COM INC 6.13% 3.40%
ALPHABET CLASS A 4.91% 2.74%
BROADCOM INC 4.10% 2.25%
ALPHABET CLASS C 3.94% 2.21%
ELI LILLY 2.25% 1.26%
JPMORGAN CHASE & CO 2.11% 1.19%
EXXONMOBIL HOLDINGS CORP 1.65% 0.93%
JOHNSON & JOHNSON 1.50% 0.84%
WALMART 1.18% 0.65%
Only in IOO
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.12%
ASML HOLDING 1.65%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.80%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.75%
SHELL 0.69%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.62%
NOVARTIS AG 0.62%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.58%
Only in IWV
META PLATFORMS CLASS A 2.11%
MICRON TECHNOLOGY 1.55%
TESLA INC 1.49%
ADVANCED MICRO DEVICES 1.32%
BERKSHIRE HATHAWAY INC CLASS B 1.28%
VISA CLASS A 0.87%
ABBVIE 0.65%
PALANTIR TECHNOLOGIES CLASS A 0.62%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IOO
iShares Global 100 ETF
IWV
iShares Russell 3000 ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +21.1% +16.7%
Its benchmark over the same days not published +16.8% (VTHR)
Gap to its benchmark not available −0.1 pts vs VTHR
Expense ratio 0.40% 0.20%
Already in the S&P 500 79.0% 87.8%
Holdings 104 2600
Net assets $9.4bn $20.6bn

IOO and IWV on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

About IOO

IOO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +21.1% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 79% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 104 positions, with the top ten at 59.9%.

About IWV

IWV tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.7% with distributions reinvested, against +16.8% for its benchmark, the Russell 3000 Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.20% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 88% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,600 positions, with the top ten at 34.7%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IOO or IWV?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IOO returned +21.1% and IWV +16.7%.
Which is cheaper, IOO or IWV?
IWV is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IOO and IWV overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 79% of IOO and 88% of IWV by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Other comparisons
Where these figures came from

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IOO against IWV, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ioo-vs-iwv

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.