IMFL vs IMTM: Differences, Returns & Fees
IMFL and IMTM hold 38% of their weight in the same names, and IMFL returned +21.0% over the year. Net assets on Oct 20, 2026: $1.1bn for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF and $4.2bn for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF.
IMTM costs 0.04 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 7.9 points; IMTM is 3.8 times larger.
| IMFL | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.34% | 0.30% |
| Net assets | $1.1bn | $4.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +21.0% | +13.1% |
| What it tracks | FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 38% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.2% | 24.3% |
| Below its high | 4.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 5.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
IMFL and IMTM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. IMFL follows FTSE Developed ex US Invesco Dynamic Multifactor Index and IMTM follows MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index.
- Holdings in common. 38% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Oct 19, 2026).
- One-year total return. Over 1 year to Oct 20, 2026 IMFL returned +21.0% and IMTM +13.1% with distributions reinvested, a gap of 7.9 points.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, IMFL and IMTM hold 38% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Oct 19, 2026.
half
38% in common
On the same fields
IMFL and IMTM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About IMFL
IMFL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +21.0% with distributions reinvested, against +12.5% for its benchmark, the MSCI EAFE Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,155 positions, with the top ten at 20.2%. It sat 4.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IMTM
IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 309 positions, with the top ten at 24.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, IMFL or IMTM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IMFL returned +21.0% and IMTM +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, IMFL or IMTM?
- IMTM is cheaper, by 0.04 percentage points a year. That is about $4 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, IMFL against IMTM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imfl-vs-imtm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). IMFL against IMTM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imfl-vs-imtm
[IMFL against IMTM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/imfl-vs-imtm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.