DFSI vs IMTM: Differences, Returns & Fees
DFSI and IMTM hold 24% of their weight in the same names, and IMTM returned +13.1% over the year. Net assets: $1.1bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Dimensional International Sustainability Core 1 ETF, and $4.2bn on Oct 20, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Momentum Factor ETF.
DFSI costs 0.06 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.2 points; IMTM is 3.6 times larger.
| DFSI | IMTM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.24% | 0.30% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $1.1bn | $4.2bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +11.9% | +13.1% |
| What it tracks | No index, actively managed | MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index |
| Holdings in common | 24% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 9.7% | 24.3% |
| Below its high | 4.6%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 5.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
DFSI and IMTM are built for the same job. How do they differ in cost, holdings and results?
- What each follows. DFSI follows No index, actively managed and IMTM follows MSCI World ex USA Momentum Index.
- Holdings in common. 24% of the weight is in the same securities (holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026).
- Number of holdings. DFSI holds 2,798 positions and IMTM holds 309.
Data as of Oct 20, 2026. The differences are picked by a fixed rule, in a fixed order; the PDF prints it. Page 2 has the returns, overlap, risks and sources.
Take this comparison to a client
The two-page PDF for this pair is coming. Save the comparison to follow its changes. Free. It needs an email sign-in, once.
Not advice. The brief uses the figures on this page, with the data date and a report id. Saved comparisons are listed on your saved page; privacy.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, DFSI and IMTM hold 24% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 19, 2026.
half
24% in common
On the same fields
DFSI and IMTM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 20, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
About DFSI
DFSI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +11.9% with distributions reinvested. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.24% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 2,798 positions, with the top ten at 9.7%. It sat 4.6% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
About IMTM
IMTM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 20, 2026 it returned +13.1% with distributions reinvested, against +15.0% for its benchmark, the MSCI ACWI ex USA Index. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.30% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 19, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 309 positions, with the top ten at 24.3%. It sat 5.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 20, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, DFSI or IMTM?
- In the year to Oct 20, 2026, with distributions reinvested, DFSI returned +11.9% and IMTM +13.1%.
- Which is cheaper, DFSI or IMTM?
- DFSI is cheaper, by 0.06 percentage points a year. That is about $6 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, DFSI against IMTM, data as of Oct 20, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfsi-vs-imtm
ETFIQ. (Oct 20, 2026). DFSI against IMTM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfsi-vs-imtm
[DFSI against IMTM (ETFIQ, Oct 20, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/dfsi-vs-imtm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.