Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or IMFL?

In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +18.2% and IMFL +23.1%.

Which is cheaper, ACWX or IMFL?

ACWX is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.

How much do ACWX and IMFL overlap with the S&P 500?

By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of IMFL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Share on X Download as PDF

Ask IQ about these two funds

ACWX vs IMFL: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWX and IMFL hold 54% of their weight in the same names, and IMFL returned +23.1% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $17.6bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and $1.1bn for Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF.

ACWX costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 4.9 points; ACWX is 16.4 times larger.

	ACWX	IMFL
Expense ratio	0.32%	0.34%
Net assets	$17.6bn	$1.1bn
Total return, 1 year	+18.2%	+23.1%
What it tracks	MSCI ACWI ex USA Index	not read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common	54%
Holdings dated	Oct 8, 2026	Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund	16.6%	21.2%
Below its high	3.9%, high on Sep 4, 2026	4.8%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.2%

ACWX total return, 1 year

+23.1%

IMFL total return, 1 year

0.32%

ACWX expense ratio

0.34%

IMFL expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and IMFL hold 54% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

50%

half

54% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first

Holding ACWX IMFL

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.52% 4.98%

ASML HOLDING 1.95% 2.71%

SK HYNIX 1.91% 2.35%

ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.82% 2.02%

SHELL 0.80% 1.60%

NOVARTIS AG 0.71% 2.21%

ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.65% 1.02%

NESTLE SA 0.65% 1.48%

BHP GROUP LTD 0.60% 1.51%

SAP 0.58% 0.94%

BANCO SANTANDER 0.53% 0.64%

TOTALENERGIES 0.46% 1.03%

Only in ACWX

TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.41%

TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.89%

ALIBABA GROUP HOLDING 0.62%

MEDIATEK 0.60%

DELTA ELECTRONICS 0.33%

NOVO NORDISK CLASS B 0.33%

SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS NON VOTING PRE 0.33%

CHINA CONSTRUCTION BANK CORP H 0.29%

Only in IMFL

Investor AB 1.32%

Samsung Electronics Co Ltd 0.66%

Novo Nordisk A/S 0.51%

Investor AB 0.35%

Atlas Copco AB 0.29%

Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG in Muenchen 0.27%

Hong Kong Exchanges & Clearing Ltd 0.22%

Waste Connections Inc 0.18%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWX

iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF

IMFL

Invesco International Developed Dynamic Multifactor ETF

Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF

Issuer iShares Invesco

What it is Tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Tracks an index

Total return, 1 year +18.2% +23.1%

S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%

Gap to the S&P 500 +1.0 pts +5.8 pts

Expense ratio 0.32% 0.34%

Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%

Holdings 1908 1155

Net assets $17.6bn $1.1bn

ACWX and IMFL on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWX in plain words

ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,908 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IMFL in plain words

IMFL tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.1% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.34% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,155 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or IMFL?: In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +18.2% and IMFL +23.1%.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or IMFL?: ACWX is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWX and IMFL overlap with the S&P 500?: By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of IMFL by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.

Other comparisons

ACWX vs DMXF ACWX vs GSID ACWX vs BBIN ACWX vs VSGX DFAI vs IMFL DFIC vs IMFL IMFL vs IQLT CORO vs IMFL

ACWX on its own →IMFL on its own →Hold both: look the portfolio through →Rankings →Standards and sources →

Where these figures came from

ACWX filings on SEC EDGAR ↗ACWX prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗iShares page for ACWX ↗IMFL filings on SEC EDGAR ↗IMFL prospectus with the expense ratio (SEC) ↗Invesco page for IMFL ↗

ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.

How this is computed

Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.

Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWX against IMFL, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-imfl

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.