ACWX vs IDMO: Differences, Returns & Fees

ACWX and IDMO hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and ACWX returned +18.2% over the year. Net assets on Oct 9, 2026: $17.6bn for iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF and $4.3bn for Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF.

IDMO costs 0.07 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.3 points; ACWX is 4.1 times larger.

ACWXIDMO
Expense ratio0.32%0.25%
Net assets$17.6bn$4.3bn
Total return, 1 year+18.2%+16.9%
What it tracksMSCI ACWI ex USA Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common21%
Holdings datedOct 8, 2026Oct 10, 2026
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.6%36.3%
Below its high3.9%, high on Sep 4, 20264.8%, high on Aug 17, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.2%
ACWX total return, 1 year
+16.9%
IDMO total return, 1 year
0.32%
ACWX expense ratio
0.25%
IDMO expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ACWX and IDMO hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Oct 8, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ACWX IDMO
ASML HOLDING 1.95% 9.38%
HSBC HOLDINGS PLC 0.86% 4.15%
ROYAL BANK OF CANADA 0.73% 5.09%
NOVARTIS AG 0.71% 2.50%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 0.66% 2.79%
BHP GROUP LTD 0.60% 2.13%
BANCO SANTANDER 0.53% 1.97%
ADVANTEST 0.52% 2.37%
TORONTO DOMINION 0.52% 3.46%
TOTALENERGIES 0.46% 1.97%
SCHNEIDER ELECTRIC 0.45% 1.16%
SUMITOMO MITSUI FINANCIAL GROUP 0.43% 1.76%
Only in ACWX
TAIWAN SEMICONDUCTOR MANUFACTURING 5.41%
SAMSUNG ELECTRONICS LTD 2.52%
SK HYNIX 1.91%
TENCENT HOLDINGS 0.89%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 0.82%
SHELL 0.80%
ASTRAZENECA PLC 0.65%
NESTLE SA 0.65%
Only in IDMO
Investor AB 0.88%
Nordea Bank Abp 0.67%
Swedbank AB 0.53%
Skandinaviska Enskilda Banken AB 0.32%
Svenska Handelsbanken AB 0.21%
NGK Corp 0.18%
Mebuki Financial Group Inc 0.12%
Shizuoka Financial Group Inc 0.11%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ACWX
iShares MSCI ACWI ex U.S. ETF
IDMO
Invesco S&P International Developed Momentum ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S. Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +18.2% +16.9%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.0 pts −0.3 pts
Expense ratio 0.32% 0.25%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 1908 167
Net assets $17.6bn $4.3bn

ACWX and IDMO on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ACWX in plain words

ACWX tracks the MSCI ACWI ex U.S.. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.2% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.32% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 1,908 positions, with the top ten at 16.6%. It sat 3.9% below its high of Sep 4, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

IDMO in plain words

IDMO tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +16.9% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.25% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 10, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 167 positions, with the top ten at 36.3%. It sat 4.8% below its high of Aug 17, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ACWX or IDMO?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ACWX returned +18.2% and IDMO +16.9%.
Which is cheaper, ACWX or IDMO?
IDMO is cheaper, by 0.07 percentage points a year. That is about $7 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ACWX and IDMO overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ACWX and 0% of IDMO by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ACWX against IDMO, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/acwx-vs-idmo

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.