GCOW vs LVHI: Differences, Returns & Fees

GCOW and LVHI hold 27% of their weight in the same names, and LVHI returned +24.7% over the year. Net assets: $3.4bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF, and $5.9bn on Oct 9, 2026 for Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF.

LVHI costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.1 points; GCOW is 2.1 times larger.

GCOWLVHI
Expense ratio0.60%0.40%
Net assets, as of Jan 31, 2022$180m$86m
Total return, 1 year+19.6%+24.7%
What it tracksPacer Global Cash Cows Dividend IndexFranklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Hedged Index
Holdings in common27%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund20.5%21.2%
Below its high5.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

+19.6%
GCOW total return, 1 year
+24.7%
LVHI total return, 1 year
0.60%
GCOW expense ratio
0.40%
LVHI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, GCOW and LVHI hold 27% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jun 30, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.

half

27% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding GCOW LVHI
Unilever PLC 2.19% 2.13%
Novartis AG 2.02% 2.13%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 2.00% 1.99%
GSK PLC 1.93% 1.75%
Nestle SA 1.99% 1.75%
TotalEnergies SE 1.90% 1.60%
Enel SpA 1.95% 1.57%
Sanofi SA 1.83% 1.18%
Reckitt Benckiser Group PLC 1.21% 0.87%
Imperial Brands PLC 1.00% 0.85%
Diageo PLC 1.15% 0.81%
Tesco PLC 0.76% 0.78%
Only in GCOW
Bristol-Myers Squibb Co 2.19%
Philip Morris International In 2.06%
Chevron Corp 2.02%
British American Tobacco PLC 2.01%
Medtronic PLC 2.01%
Verizon Communications Inc 1.98%
AT&T Inc 1.96%
BP PLC 1.96%
Only in LVHI
SHELL PLC 2.30%
BHP GROUP LTD 2.21%
INTESA SANPAOLO SPA 2.19%
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA (THE) 2.19%
RIO TINTO PLC 2.14%
CANADIAN IMPERIAL BANK OF COMMERCE 2.00%
SUNCOR ENERGY INC 1.90%
ALLIANZ SE 1.70%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

GCOW
Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF
LVHI
Franklin International Low Volatility High Dividend Index ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +19.6% +24.7%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.3 pts +7.4 pts
Expense ratio 0.60% 0.40%
Already in the S&P 500 21.5% 0.0%
Holdings 100 193
Net assets, GCOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and LVHI as of Oct 9, 2026 $3.4bn $5.9bn

GCOW and LVHI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

GCOW in plain words

GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

LVHI in plain words

LVHI tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +24.7% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.40% a year. By its holdings filed for Jun 30, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 193 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, GCOW or LVHI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GCOW returned +19.6% and LVHI +24.7%.
Which is cheaper, GCOW or LVHI?
LVHI is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do GCOW and LVHI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 22% of GCOW and 0% of LVHI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, GCOW against LVHI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-lvhi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.