GCOW vs SCHY: Differences, Returns & Fees
GCOW and SCHY hold 23% of their weight in the same names, and GCOW returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets: $3.4bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF, and $2.3bn on May 31, 2026 for Schwab International Dividend Equity ETF.
SCHY costs 0.52 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 1.6 points.
| GCOW | SCHY | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.08% |
| Net assets, GCOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and SCHY as of May 31, 2026 | $3.4bn | $2.3bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +18.0% |
| What it tracks | Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 23% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.5% | 41.8% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 5.1%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GCOW and SCHY hold 23% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated May 31, 2026 and Jul 31, 2026.
half
23% in common
On the same fields
GCOW and SCHY on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GCOW in plain words
GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
SCHY in plain words
SCHY tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.0% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.08% a year. By its holdings filed for May 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 41.8%. It sat 5.1% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GCOW or SCHY?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GCOW returned +19.6% and SCHY +18.0%.
- Which is cheaper, GCOW or SCHY?
- SCHY is cheaper, by 0.52 percentage points a year. That is about $52 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GCOW against SCHY, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-schy
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GCOW against SCHY. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-schy
[GCOW against SCHY (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-schy)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.