GCOW vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees
GCOW and RODM hold 15% of their weight in the same names, and GCOW returned +19.6% over the year. Net assets: $3.4bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.
RODM costs 0.31 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.8 points; GCOW is 2.1 times larger.
| GCOW | RODM | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.29% |
| Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026 | $3.4bn | $1.6bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +18.8% |
| What it tracks | Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 15% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.5% | 11.1% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 4.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GCOW and RODM hold 15% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
15% in common
On the same fields
GCOW and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GCOW in plain words
GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
RODM in plain words
RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GCOW or RODM?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GCOW returned +19.6% and RODM +18.8%.
- Which is cheaper, GCOW or RODM?
- RODM is cheaper, by 0.31 percentage points a year. That is about $31 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GCOW against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-rodm
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GCOW against RODM. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-rodm
[GCOW against RODM (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-rodm)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.