RODM vs WCMI: Differences, Returns & Fees

RODM and WCMI hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and RODM returned +18.8% over the year. Net assets: $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF, and $2.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust WCM International Equity ETF.

RODM costs 0.56 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.4 points.

RODMWCMI
Expense ratio0.29%0.85%
Net assets, RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 and WCMI as of Oct 9, 2026$1.6bn$2.1bn
Total return, 1 year+18.8%+12.4%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund11.1%42.9%
Below its high4.3%, high on Sep 3, 20265.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+18.8%
RODM total return, 1 year
+12.4%
WCMI total return, 1 year
0.29%
RODM expense ratio
0.85%
WCMI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, RODM and WCMI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

2% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding RODM WCMI
Tesco PLC 0.45% 3.02%
Canadian Natural Resources Ltd 0.41% 2.57%
Haleon PLC 0.36% 1.67%
Muenchener Rueckversicherungs-Gesellschaft AG in Muenchen 0.27% 1.49%
Heidelberg Materials AG 0.23% 1.00%
Mizuho Financial Group Inc 0.04% 3.31%
Only in RODM
Royal Bank of Canada 1.22%
Bank of Montreal 1.21%
Equinor ASA 1.20%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 1.14%
BOC Hong Kong Holdings Ltd 1.13%
ASML Holding NV 1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA 1.07%
Great-West Lifeco Inc 1.05%
Only in WCMI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. 7.69%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc 6.30%
Nebius Group N.V. 5.19%
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 3.81%
Constellation Software Inc. 3.80%
Kioxia Holdings Corporation 3.46%
Babcock International Group Plc 3.26%
Sony Group Corp. (ADR) 3.10%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
WCMI
First Trust WCM International Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +18.8% +12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +1.5 pts −4.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.29% 0.85%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 4.7%
Holdings 336 42
Net assets, RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 and WCMI as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.6bn $2.1bn

RODM and WCMI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

RODM in plain words

RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

WCMI in plain words

WCMI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 5% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 42 positions, with the top ten at 42.9%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, RODM or WCMI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, RODM returned +18.8% and WCMI +12.4%.
Which is cheaper, RODM or WCMI?
RODM is cheaper, by 0.56 percentage points a year. That is about $56 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do RODM and WCMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of RODM and 5% of WCMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, RODM against WCMI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/rodm-vs-wcmi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.