ICOW vs WCMI: Differences, Returns & Fees

ICOW and WCMI hold 2% of their weight in the same names, and ICOW returned +19.3% over the year. Net assets: $1.7bn on Oct 2, 2026 for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF, and $2.1bn on Oct 9, 2026 for First Trust WCM International Equity ETF.

ICOW costs 0.20 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 6.9 points; WCMI is 1.2 times larger.

ICOWWCMI
Expense ratio0.65%0.85%
Net assets, as of Oct 2, 2026$1.7bn$2.1bn
Total return, 1 year+19.3%+12.4%
What it tracksnot read by ETFIQNo index, actively managed
Holdings in common2%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund21.2%42.9%
Below its high6.7%, high on Aug 25, 20265.3%, high on Aug 14, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

+19.3%
ICOW total return, 1 year
+12.4%
WCMI total return, 1 year
0.65%
ICOW expense ratio
0.85%
WCMI expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, ICOW and WCMI hold 2% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 9, 2026.

half

2% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding ICOW WCMI
Tesco PLC 1.63% 3.02%
Only in ICOW
Takeda Pharmaceutical Co Ltd 2.22%
KDDI Corp 2.20%
Deutsche Post AG 2.19%
CK Hutchison Holdings Ltd 2.14%
Suncor Energy Inc 2.14%
Vodafone Group PLC 2.13%
Sony Group Corp 2.12%
Shell PLC 2.09%
Only in WCMI
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Company Ltd. 7.69%
Rolls-Royce Holdings Plc 6.30%
Nebius Group N.V. 5.19%
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries Ltd. 3.81%
Constellation Software Inc. 3.80%
Kioxia Holdings Corporation 3.46%
Mizuho Financial Group, Inc. 3.31%
Babcock International Group Plc 3.26%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

ICOW
Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF
WCMI
First Trust WCM International Equity ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Actively managed
Total return, 1 year +19.3% +12.4%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +2.0 pts −4.8 pts
Expense ratio 0.65% 0.85%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 4.7%
Holdings 100 42
Net assets, ICOW as of Oct 2, 2026 and WCMI as of Oct 9, 2026 $1.7bn $2.1bn

ICOW and WCMI on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

ICOW in plain words

ICOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

WCMI in plain words

WCMI is actively managed and tracks no index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +12.4% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.85% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 9, 2026, 5% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 42 positions, with the top ten at 42.9%. It sat 5.3% below its high of Aug 14, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, ICOW or WCMI?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, ICOW returned +19.3% and WCMI +12.4%.
Which is cheaper, ICOW or WCMI?
ICOW is cheaper, by 0.20 percentage points a year. That is about $20 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do ICOW and WCMI overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of ICOW and 5% of WCMI by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, ICOW against WCMI, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/icow-vs-wcmi

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.