GCOW vs ICOW: Differences, Returns & Fees
GCOW and ICOW hold 26% of their weight in the same names. Net assets on Oct 2, 2026: $3.4bn for Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend ETF and $1.7bn for Pacer Developed Markets International Cash Cows 100 ETF.
GCOW costs 0.05 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 0.3 points; GCOW is 2.0 times larger.
| GCOW | ICOW | |
|---|---|---|
| Expense ratio | 0.60% | 0.65% |
| Net assets, as of Oct 2, 2026 | $3.4bn | $1.7bn |
| Total return, 1 year | +19.6% | +19.3% |
| What it tracks | Pacer Global Cash Cows Dividend Index | not read by ETFIQ |
| Holdings in common | 26% | |
| Top ten holdings, share of the fund | 20.5% | 21.2% |
| Below its high | 5.2%, high on Aug 25, 2026 | 6.7%, high on Aug 25, 2026 |
Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
What they hold in common
By the books each fund has filed, GCOW and ICOW hold 26% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026.
half
26% in common
On the same fields
GCOW and ICOW on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.
GCOW in plain words
GCOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.6% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.60% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 22% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 20.5%. It sat 5.2% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
ICOW in plain words
ICOW tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +19.3% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.65% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 100 positions, with the top ten at 21.2%. It sat 6.7% below its high of Aug 25, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.
Questions people ask
- Which returned more over the last year, GCOW or ICOW?
- In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, GCOW returned +19.6% and ICOW +19.3%.
- Which is cheaper, GCOW or ICOW?
- GCOW is cheaper, by 0.05 percentage points a year. That is about $5 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
ETFIQ links to the documents behind every figure; a link is not an endorsement. A comparison is not a recommendation.
How this is computed
Overlap adds up the smaller of the two weights for each security both funds hold.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown
ETFIQ, GCOW against ICOW, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-icow
ETFIQ. (Oct 9, 2026). GCOW against ICOW. Retrieved from https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-icow
[GCOW against ICOW (ETFIQ, Oct 9, 2026)](https://etfiq.com/compare/any/gcow-vs-icow)
Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.