IVLU vs RODM: Differences, Returns & Fees

IVLU and RODM hold 21% of their weight in the same names, and IVLU returned +23.8% over the year. Net assets: $4.4bn on Oct 9, 2026 for iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF, and $1.6bn on Jul 31, 2026 for Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF.

RODM costs 0.02 points a year less; their one-year returns differ by 5.0 points; IVLU is 2.7 times larger.

IVLURODM
Expense ratio0.31%0.29%
Net assets, as of Jul 31, 2026$4.4bn$1.6bn
Total return, 1 year+23.8%+18.8%
What it tracksMSCI World ex USA Enhanced Value Indexnot read by ETFIQ
Holdings in common21%
Top ten holdings, share of the fund16.2%11.1%
Below its high6.0%, high on Sep 3, 20264.3%, high on Sep 3, 2026

Holdings in common uses holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

+23.8%
IVLU total return, 1 year
+18.8%
RODM total return, 1 year
0.31%
IVLU expense ratio
0.29%
RODM expense ratio

What they hold in common

By the books each fund has filed, IVLU and RODM hold 21% of their money in the same securities at the same weight. Above 50%, holding both is close to holding one of them twice. Holdings dated Jul 31, 2026 and Oct 8, 2026.

half

21% in common

Positions both hold, largest shared weight first
Holding IVLU RODM
NOVARTIS AG 1.28% 0.88%
TOTALENERGIES 1.18% 0.68%
RIO TINTO 0.77% 0.67%
BHP GROUP LTD 1.00% 0.58%
REPSOL 0.55% 0.62%
BANK OF NOVA SCOTIA 0.49% 0.98%
AERCAP HOLDINGS 0.51% 0.47%
CAPGEMINI 0.46% 0.58%
MITSUBISHI 0.97% 0.45%
MANULIFE FINANCIAL 0.44% 0.74%
SANOFI SA 1.19% 0.40%
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICAL 0.44% 0.38%
Only in IVLU
TOYOTA MOTOR 1.89%
BANCO SANTANDER 1.70%
BNP PARIBAS SA 1.59%
ROCHE PS PAR AG 1.46%
SIEMENS N AG 1.43%
MITSUBISHI UFJ FINANCIAL GROUP 1.27%
BANCO BILBAO VIZCAYA ARGENTARIA SA 1.12%
BARCLAYS PLC 1.07%
Only in RODM
Royal Bank of Canada 1.22%
Bank of Montreal 1.21%
Equinor ASA 1.20%
Toronto-Dominion Bank/The 1.14%
ASML Holding NV 1.08%
Millicom International Cellular SA 1.07%
Great-West Lifeco Inc 1.05%
Roche Holding AG 0.90%

Check overlap with more funds →

On the same fields

IVLU
iShares MSCI Intl Value Factor ETF
RODM
Hartford Multifactor Developed Markets (ex-US) ETF
Where it sits Stock ETF Stock ETF
What it is Tracks an index Tracks an index
Total return, 1 year +23.8% +18.8%
S&P 500 over the same days +17.3% +17.3%
Gap to the S&P 500 +6.5 pts +1.5 pts
Expense ratio 0.31% 0.29%
Already in the S&P 500 0.0% 0.0%
Holdings 344 336
Net assets, IVLU as of Oct 9, 2026 and RODM as of Jul 31, 2026 $4.4bn $1.6bn

IVLU and RODM on the fields both publish, as of Oct 9, 2026. Source: ETFIQ.

IVLU in plain words

IVLU tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +23.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.31% a year. By its holdings published by its issuer for Oct 8, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 344 positions, with the top ten at 16.2%. It sat 6.0% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

RODM in plain words

RODM tracks an index. Over the year to Oct 9, 2026 it returned +18.8% with distributions reinvested, against +17.3% for the S&P 500. The prospectus expense ratio is 0.29% a year. By its holdings filed for Jul 31, 2026, 0% of the fund by weight is stocks the S&P 500 also holds, across 336 positions, with the top ten at 11.1%. It sat 4.3% below its high of Sep 3, 2026 on Oct 9, 2026.

Questions people ask

Which returned more over the last year, IVLU or RODM?
In the year to Oct 9, 2026, with distributions reinvested, IVLU returned +23.8% and RODM +18.8%.
Which is cheaper, IVLU or RODM?
RODM is cheaper, by 0.02 percentage points a year. That is about $2 on $10,000 held for a year. Fees come from each fund's prospectus.
How much do IVLU and RODM overlap with the S&P 500?
By their latest filed holdings, 0% of IVLU and 0% of RODM by weight is stocks the S&P 500 already holds.
Cite this pageCitation, APA and Markdown

ETFIQ, IVLU against RODM, data as of Oct 9, 2026. https://etfiq.com/compare/any/ivlu-vs-rodm

Open data

Free to use with attribution for figures ETFIQ computes; issuer data stays under its owner's terms.